Laserfiche WebLink
Table II-2 (Continued) <br />Impact Findings of Environmental Assessmentl/ <br />Impacts of the <br />Potentially Affected Resource Impacts of the Proposed Action "No Action" Alternative <br />Future water development will be facili- Future water development could be hindered by <br />tated by a Section 7 approach which permits Section 7 consultation which could require a <br />water developers to offset depletion impacts developer to modify project design or operations <br />with a monetary contribution toward the to avoid depletion impacts to endangered fish. <br />recovery program. <br />The construction planned within the program Similar to the Proposed Action, though the posi- <br />($5 million fund for capital expenditures) tive impacts from planned construction would be <br />will have minor, positive impacts on popula- less. <br />tion, employment, and income within the Upper <br />Basin. <br />N <br />N <br />L. Archeological/Cultural Resources The assumed flow releases are unlikely to Same as the Proposed Action. <br />adversely affect archeological/cultural <br />resources. <br />1/Future actions nay be different from those assumed in the environmental assessment. If so, appropriate site-specific National <br />Environmental Policy Act review will be conducted. <br />D <br />m <br />z <br />D <br />r <br />m <br />z <br />D <br />C <br />m <br />z <br />n <br />r <br />c <br />0 <br />z <br />m <br />v <br />O <br />O <br />N <br />m <br />0 <br />D <br />n <br />O <br />z <br />