Laserfiche WebLink
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M ¦. M M <br />Table II-2 (Continued) <br />Impact Findings of Environmental Assessmentl/ <br />Inpacts of the <br />Potentially Affected Resource Impacts of the Proposed Action "No Action" Alternative <br />2. Natural riparian-wetland The assumed flow changes are expected to have Similar to Proposed Action. <br />habitat only minor, redistributional effects on exist- <br />ing riparian-wetland habitat. <br />3. Irrigation-associated There is a possibility that same agricultural Agricultural wetlands may not be lost as a re- <br />riparian habitat wetlands might be lost if water for instream sult of rare fish conservation efforts, but could <br />flows is purchased from fanners. Flovever, be lost anyway if farmers decide to sell water for <br />these potential losses could be offset by municipal and irrigation uses. <br />downstream benefits from water purchases <br />or improvement of other wetlands. <br />4. Terrestrial wildlife No significant impacts to stream-associated Similar to Proposed Action. <br />wildlife species are anticipated fran assumed <br />flow changes. <br />H <br />F. Other Endangered and Threatened No significant impacts are anticipated to Same as Proposed Action. <br />Species other listed species (Table III-F-1) fran <br />the assumed flow changes. Site-specific <br />actions which might adversely impact other <br />listed species would be preceded by <br />Section 7 consultation to avoid or minimize <br />any adverse inpacts. <br />G. Candidate Species No significant impacts are anticipated. Same as Proposed Action. <br />D <br />m <br />D <br />r <br />m <br />z <br />a <br />m <br />N. Recreational Boating Ruedi: Increased probability that two Ruedi: Sane as Proposed Action. <br />reservoir boat ramps will be unusable in <br />July (2 percent) and August (8 percent).