Laserfiche WebLink
Table II-2 (Continued) <br />Irrpact Findings of Environmental Assessmentl/ _ <br />n <br />00 <br />m <br />Impacts of the <br />Potentially Affected Resource Impacts of the Proposed Action "No Action" Alternative <br />D. Nonnative Fishes (with Coldwater fish: The Proposed Action has the Coldwater fish: Same as Proposed Action. <br />emphasis on sport fish) potential to benefit or adversely impact <br /> coldwater fishes in tailwaters as a result <br /> of changes in dam releases. Ruedi releases <br /> are expected to cause sore loss of brown <br /> trout spawning habitat, but the remaining <br /> habitat is still greater than the amount <br /> necessary to sustain a quality trout popu- <br /> lation. Flaming Gorge summer releases should <br /> benefit the tailwater trout fishery, but <br /> enhanced autumn/winter releases might result <br /> in a negative inpact. Aspinall August-September n <br /> releases in dry years should benefit the trout <br /> fishery downstream. M <br /> <br />WanTwater fish: The program could have an <br />Wanrwater fish: Similar to Proposed Action, i.e., z <br />-? <br /> adverse impact on nonnative fishes identi- this alternative could adversely impact problem M <br /> fied as "problem" species, i.e., nonnative wamwater nonnative fish. However, adverse impacts rn <br /> species known to prey on or compete with to problem wamwater fish would occur more gradu- <br /> the rare and endangered fishes. The degree ally than under the Proposed Action. <br /> of impact would depend on the control method <br /> used, the species involved, and the intensity o <br /> of the control effort. However, inpacts are <br /> not expected to be major. <br /> M <br />E. Terrestrial Biological Resources -o <br />1. Waterfowl habitat The assumed flow releases from Flaming Gorge Sane as Proposed Action. o <br /> will not affect waterfowl nesting in the o <br /> spring. Increased auturn flaws will benefit m <br /> migrating waterfowl. Reduced summer flaws o <br /> from Flaming Gorge will likely result in <br /> increased purging costs at waterfowl manage- <br /> ment areas in average to wet years. C) <br />