My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7281 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7281 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:55 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:18:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7281
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Recovery Implementation Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin, Environmental Assessment, November 1987.
USFW Year
1987.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
189
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Table II-2 (Continued) <br />Irrpact Findings of Environmental Assessmentl/ _ <br />n <br />00 <br />m <br />Impacts of the <br />Potentially Affected Resource Impacts of the Proposed Action "No Action" Alternative <br />D. Nonnative Fishes (with Coldwater fish: The Proposed Action has the Coldwater fish: Same as Proposed Action. <br />emphasis on sport fish) potential to benefit or adversely impact <br /> coldwater fishes in tailwaters as a result <br /> of changes in dam releases. Ruedi releases <br /> are expected to cause sore loss of brown <br /> trout spawning habitat, but the remaining <br /> habitat is still greater than the amount <br /> necessary to sustain a quality trout popu- <br /> lation. Flaming Gorge summer releases should <br /> benefit the tailwater trout fishery, but <br /> enhanced autumn/winter releases might result <br /> in a negative inpact. Aspinall August-September n <br /> releases in dry years should benefit the trout <br /> fishery downstream. M <br /> <br />WanTwater fish: The program could have an <br />Wanrwater fish: Similar to Proposed Action, i.e., z <br />-? <br /> adverse impact on nonnative fishes identi- this alternative could adversely impact problem M <br /> fied as "problem" species, i.e., nonnative wamwater nonnative fish. However, adverse impacts rn <br /> species known to prey on or compete with to problem wamwater fish would occur more gradu- <br /> the rare and endangered fishes. The degree ally than under the Proposed Action. <br /> of impact would depend on the control method <br /> used, the species involved, and the intensity o <br /> of the control effort. However, inpacts are <br /> not expected to be major. <br /> M <br />E. Terrestrial Biological Resources -o <br />1. Waterfowl habitat The assumed flow releases from Flaming Gorge Sane as Proposed Action. o <br /> will not affect waterfowl nesting in the o <br /> spring. Increased auturn flaws will benefit m <br /> migrating waterfowl. Reduced summer flaws o <br /> from Flaming Gorge will likely result in <br /> increased purging costs at waterfowl manage- <br /> ment areas in average to wet years. C) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.