My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7200
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7200
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:55 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 3:11:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7200
Author
Odenkirchen, E. W. and R. Eisler.
Title
Chlorpyrifos Hazards to Fish, Wildlife, and Invertebrates
USFW Year
1988.
USFW - Doc Type
A Synoptic Review.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />Current water quality criteria formulated for ch1orpyrifos by the U.S. <br />Environmental Protection Agency (EPA 1986) for aquatic life protection seem to <br />afford a reasonable degree of safety, at least during short-term exposure. <br />Specifically, the proposed criteria for freshwater are 0.041 ugjl (4-day <br />average concentration) and 0.083 ugjl (I-hour average concentration), neither <br />of which should be exceeded more than once every 3 years; for saltwater, the <br />criteria are 0.0056 ugjl and 0.011 ug/l, respectively. <br /> <br />The acceptable tolerance level of ch1orpyrifos in meat and meat <br />by-products destined for human consumption is 2.0 mg/kg fresh weight (Byford <br />et a1. 1986). The significance of this concentration to animal health, or to <br />consumers other than man, is unknown. More research is needed to establish <br />maximum tolerable chlorpyrifos limits in tissues of sensitive fish and <br />wildlife. <br /> <br />Information is lacking on the effectiveness of chlorpyrifos in <br />large-scale (>40 ha) co1dwater ecosystems, typical of those found in Alaska or <br />northern tier States; accordingly, we recommend initiation of long-term <br />studies in these potential problem areas. <br /> <br />As judged by our analysis of available literature, three courses of <br />action now seem warranted: (1) Restrict the use of chlorpyrifos for mosquito <br />control in wetlands, estuaries, and waterfowl breeding areas because <br />recommended treatment levels are demonstrably harmful to nontarget species, <br />including mallard ducklings. The unsuitability of chlorpyrifos for mosquito <br />control is further supported by the finding that certain mosquito populations <br />in California are showing signs of chlorpyrifos resistance, and thus may <br />require more aggressive future treatment programs (Reisen et a1. 1984). (2) <br />Curtail agricultural use of chlorpyrifos in watershed areas pending <br />acquisition of additional data on its transport, fate, and effects, including <br />data on chlorpyrifos flux rates from soils and sediments and its resultant <br />bioavailability. (3) Develop suitable replacements for ch10rpyrifos in <br />mosquito control programs. These replacement compounds should exhibit a <br />relatively long half-life in aquatic environments while avoiding the broad <br />spectrum toxicity typical of chlorpyrifos to large numbers of nontarget <br />organisms. <br /> <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.