Laserfiche WebLink
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br />General <br />A total of 31 Colorado squawfish were implanted with radio modules <br />in 1980 and 1981. This included 15 implanted in the Green River, 7 in <br />the Yampa River and 9 in the White River. The long distance movement <br />patterns, local movements and habitat preferences of these fish are <br />presented and discussed by year and river system. <br />Long Distance Movement <br />1980 Program <br />Colorado squawfish were implanted only in the Green River in 1980. <br />Table 1 presents information on the capture, release and major movements <br />of the six radiotelemetered Colorado squawfish studied in 1980. <br />Four Colorado squawfish were followed 3 to 4 months in 1980. These <br />fish displayed two different types of behavior (Tyus et al. 1981). Fish <br />No's 028 and 165 moved upstream in the Green River from the initial <br />release site reaching the upstream limit of movement in late June-early <br />July after traveling about 80 km (Fig. 3). These two fish then moved <br />back downstream past the point of release. Fish No. 028 was last <br />located by airplane in Labyrinth Canyon over 300 km downstream from its <br />release point. Fish No. 165 left the Green River and ascended the White <br />River to a point 56 km above its mouth, then returned to the Green <br />River-White River junction. The remaining Colorado squawfish, No's 060 <br />and 064 (Fig. 4), were relatively stationary with one fish remaining <br />within 5 km of its release point and the other traveling only about 16 <br />km. Despite considerable effort, contact was lost with No's 060 and 064 <br />during July, and movement during this time cannot be completely ruled <br />out. <br />One Colorado squawfish was recaptured from each group exhibiting <br />the two different movement patterns in order to determine maturity, - <br />condition of the fish and effects of carrying the implanted radio trans- <br />mitter. Fish No. 064 (stationary group) was recaptured and dissected <br />August 8, 1980. This fish was an immature male. Fish No. 165 (movement <br />group) was recaptured and dissected September 2. This fish was a female <br />in an advanced state of sexual maturity which may have accounted for the <br />high degree of movement not observed in the immature fish (No. 064). <br />Fish No. 165 after a movement of about 161 km in 5 days may have ex- <br />hibited spawning behavior by orienting to a riffle area in the White <br />River (RK 55.2) on July 16, 1980. <br />An inspection of the viscera of the two recaptured Colorado squaw- <br />fish implanted with radio modules was made in order to compare dif- <br />ferences in fish health to the different movement patterns. In both <br />fish, the modules were effectively walled off from the intestines by <br />adhesions and had to be teased free from this mass for inspection. No <br />evidence of irritation to internal organs was seen in either fish. <br />6