Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />JOSEPH B. HUNN <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, for example, does <br />not permit its employees to enter sites classified as <br />level A or B. Human safety is more important than <br />documenting the number of fish killed. <br />Coordinating a fish kill investigation starts even <br />before you go into the field. A specific case number <br />should be assigned to the investigation and used on <br />all labels, tags, data sheets, photographs, and other <br />records related to the incident. A number of flow <br />charts (Fig. 2.1) have been published to help coor- <br />dinate fish kill investigations (Hill 1983; Davis 1986), <br />and each agency's procedures should always be <br />followed, if they are available. Be sure to contact all <br />agency officials who need to know about the kill. The <br />names and telephone numbers of supervisors and <br />other persons or agencies to be notified of a reported <br />kill should also be on hand. If more than one agency <br />is involved in the investigation, keep all other par- <br />ticipants in the investigation fully informed so that <br />the investigation can be done safely and effective- <br />ly. However, as stressed below, it is important that <br />only one spokesperson be designated to answer ques- <br />tions from the media. <br />It is imperative that a sample identification system <br />be in place before samples are collected in the field. <br />The same unique numbering system for each sample <br />or subsample should be used by all parties dealing <br />with sample collection and processing (for further <br />information, see Chapter 7). It is important that the <br />investigator communicate with the analytical agency <br />or group before samples are collected, and that <br />methods to be followed for sample preparation and <br />analysis are agreed upon. Discussions between the <br />analysts and the investigator will help determine the <br />needed sample types, numbers, and sizes; the sample <br />identification system; collection protocols; preserva- <br />tion methods; chain-of-custody requirements; the <br />analyses to be made; when results can be expected; <br />the format of the report; and how and by whom the <br />results will be used. Selection of the appropriate <br />analytical method is important because the method <br />influences both the reliability and the cost of analysis <br />(Keith et al. 1983). <br />Publicity and News <br />Releases <br />In a fish kill investigation, one person should be <br />designated by the agencies involved to be the con- <br />tact person for the news media. This restriction <br />helps avoid contradictions and embarrassment to in- <br />vestigators and their agencies. Publicity and news <br />releases during the entire period of the investiga- <br />tion should be limited to factual accounting of the <br />conditions observed. Conjecture as to the probable <br />cause of the mortality or the persons or company <br />that might be responsible must be avoided. Infor- <br />mation that might be released would include a <br />description of the fish mortality, its extent, when it <br />was first observed, the duration of the kill, and the <br />names of agencies and personnel involved in the in- <br />vestigation. The designated contact person should <br />handle any later news interviews or releases. <br />Endangered Species <br />If a kill of an endangered fish species occurs, or <br />if a fish kill occurs in an area known to contain an <br />endangered species, it is critical that law enforce- <br />ment personnel of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />be notified immediately (see Appendix H). <br />