Laserfiche WebLink
<br />eration of the uses of the reservoirs for all purposes, including flood <br />control, river regulation, beneficial consumptive uses, power production, <br />water quality control, recreation, enhancement of fish and wildlife, and <br />other environmental factors" (Operating eriteria Article I (2)). The <br />Annual Operating Plan stated that a "normal" water supply was available <br />for beneficial use in the Colorado River Basin. <br /> <br />During water year 1991: <br /> <br />1. The minimum release objective of8.23 million acre-feet was made <br />from Lake Powell. <br /> <br />2. No flood control releases were made from Lake Mead. <br /> <br />3. The guaranteed annual quantity of 1.5 minion acre-feet was <br />delivered to Mexico. <br /> <br />4. All requests by Lower Basin mainstream holders of surplus water <br />contracts in the U.S. are expected to be fully satisfied as ealifornia <br />water contract holders were allowed to use water apportioned to but not <br />used by the States of Arizona and Nevada. <br /> <br />5. Salinity provisions of Minute 242 were met. <br /> <br />2. RUNOFF AND RESERVOIR CONTENTS AND <br />RELEASES <br /> <br />In 1991, the snowmelt inflow into Lake Powell during the April <br />through July period totaled 5.3 maf or approximately 65 percent of the <br />1906-1985 average. The computed unregulated discharge at Lees Ferry <br />for the water year ending September 30,1991 was 8.4, which is approxi- <br />mately 71 percent of the 1906-1985 average. The following tabulation <br />lists the breakdown of discharges in acre-feet in the Upper eolorado River <br />Basin: <br /> <br />Net change in surface storage <br />Net change in bank storage <br />Net evaporation <br />Glen Canyon releases <br />Paria River discharge <br />Total Unregulated Discharge at Lees Ferry <br /> <br />Acre-feet <br />-359,000 <br />-105,000 <br />591,000 <br />8,230,000 <br />10,000 <br />8,367,000 <br /> <br />57 <br />