My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7014
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:55 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 12:25:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7014
Author
Valdez, R. A. and A. Wasowicz.
Title
Non-Lethal Stomach Pumping Technique To Recovery Gut Contents of Roundtail Chub (
USFW Year
1992.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />pharynx and develop on modifications of lower elements of the last gill arch. The pharyngeal teeth <br />that characterize minnows and suckers are on the fifth pair of the ceratobranchials or gill arches, and <br />are known as the pharyngeal arches or pharyngeal bones. New World cyprinids have one to three <br />rows of pharyngeal teeth on each arch, depending on the species. The greater or primary row usually <br />has four or five teeth, and the minor or secondary row one or two teeth. Many cyprinids exhibit <br />bilateral asymmetrical counts with greater numbers of teeth on the left primary arch. The pharyngeal <br />teeth formula for most Gila sp. is 2,5-4,2 (left secondary, left primary - right primary, right secondary). <br /> <br />Cyprinoid pharyngeal teeth are unusual among vertebrate teeth in that the "enamel organs" <br />are of endodermal rather than ectodermal origin (Eastman 1977, Edwards 1929, Harder 1975). Each <br />develops from the deeper columnar layer of the pharyngeal epithelium representing the endoderm <br />of the primitive foregut. The sites for this tooth formation in the epithelium are known as anlagen; <br />the number of anlagen equals the number of pharyngeal teeth on the primary row. The crowns of <br />the teeth are probably composed entirely of dentin. The teeth first appear as tooth buds ("enamel <br />organs") in the dental lamina in a process similar to that descnbed for lower vertebrates such as <br />reptiles (Eastman and Underhill 1973, Edmund 1960). The developed tooth buds ankylose to the <br />pharyngeal arch where they are surrounded by connective tissue. The bony ankyloses serve to unite <br />the crowns to the pharyngeal bone. The ankyloses are partially resorbed by osteoclasts prior to tooth <br />loss and reformed during tooth replacement. <br /> <br />The pharyngeal teeth of cyprinids and catostomids are deciduous or polyphyodont. Each <br />definitive crown ankylosed to the pharyngeal arch has, in the surrounding mucosa, tooth buds that <br />are destined to form its replacement cap. There are the same number of anlagen on the dental <br />lamina producing tooth buds as there are major-row teeth (Eastman and Underhill 1973). Thus, <br />pharyngeal teeth patterns are often species or genus-specific. There is, however, great variation in <br />tooth counts, probably caused by either recently-shed teeth or teeth that have not yet ankylosed. <br /> <br />The pharyngeal teeth of Gila robusta and Gila ~ are described as having thick bases, <br />pointed and hooked, and with a weak grinding surface (Miller 1946, Jordan and Everman 1896). The <br />teeth observed on G. robusta used in this study ranged in size from about 1 mm to about 7 mm, and <br />were consistent in appearance with previous descriptions. <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />The preliminary results of this study show that the non-lethal stomach pump technique used <br />on roundtail chub is an efficient and safe method for recovering stomach contents, and can be <br />recommended for use with endangered humpback chub. Further analyses will be performed on the <br />data to statistically support these conclusions. <br /> <br />The stomach pump used on roundtail chub was 100% efficient at removing gut contents <br />through the anal vent, rather than through the buchal cavity. This method of anal evacuation had <br />not been tested before. Although the long-term effect of stomach pumping on round tail chub was <br />not evaluated in this study, the immediate lack of stress or disorientation by the test fish indicated <br />that no long-term ill effects can be expected from the procedure. Also, no evidence of damage to <br />the pharyngeal teeth was found following stomach pumping. Since the pharyngeal teeth are naturally <br />deciduous, damaged teeth would be replaced immediately, resulting in no long-term ill effects, even <br />if there was damage to the pharyngeal mill. <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.