Laserfiche WebLink
,} <br />_ _, ,,_ <br />(Banks 194, Ucacon x.968; Vanic:ek et a1~ 1970; hSiler 172} . <br />Recent rollectian~~ indicat.c~ nu~m;)ers a~°E> decl~.ninr~ Ewen furthe~r~ and <br />that populations a..-c comprised of larr~e, presumably old <br />individ~.TalS, T~~uch a5 in t~1u loE~ae_ ba~:in (see below) . Hol.dvn and <br />Stalnaker (1975) and t~icAda ~.nd ~dydo.3k i (1930) found razorbacks <br />scattered thrc~.zghout much of the basin, but concentrated (10 to 25 <br />individuals) in only two places, the Tnoi.ith of t}le Yampa River, <br />Colorado, and in a Llooded gravel pit (~~alker ~~7ildlife l~r_ea) <br />k <br />adjacent to the Colorado Rivt~r near Grand Junction, Colorado. <br />Extensive collections from. Green River (Utah-Colorado) in 1979-31 <br />included only 92 razorbacks, and the species was considered <br />extreme~:y rare in that system (Tytzs et al. 1932). In the <br />mainstream Colorado River, razorback was uniformly scarce fro;n <br />Rifle (Colorado) downstream to Lake Sowell (Utah) during the same <br />_ years (Valdez et al. 1932x). Two gravel pits near Grarid Junction <br />(including- Walker [°~ildlife Area) produced 37 of the 52 total. <br />razorback collected dur..ing that study, while e'> s~aere taken from <br />backwaters adjacent to the cYtannel, 5 wPr.e from Lake Powell, and <br />only •~ ~weri~ f:rorEt ~nainstem,riverine ha`~itats. Only one specimeT~ <br />has r<~,cently been reported from the Gunnison l~iiver, Cole)~rado <br />(Holc.ez., in Valdez et al. 1982b}, ~a}~;L~re the :.pecies once was <br />commons Jn 1.977, a sma17_ irrig:ztiori reservoix• connected to the <br />:Ian JUc1T~ R1VC',r (U%-:1}1) ~~7aS e!n~)tied st3'<'nC~1TIt~ 1 ~~) ~ azc)r~)r3Ck (~ ~}1riiZE' <br />~.nd P}~nic~Ti 193G) . Tire ~.~~;:cics lta~~ n~)~_. t~eEn tick: n in G~yo~ning si;!cc <br />(.::lo<~z~"E' ~J:," f'l:~!:t3T'1(~ GOr~~E? ??.3lil O1_~ ~:}ltd ~~2:F~F.-~~n ~:].~'~:3?'' ]11 19f).c (~~l<\'t~'.C' <br />i!1C~ cj1;:C?11 1~i7v e ~r,~;+_-tC(?}Cr'~, cl1 N ~.~71~) , <br />