My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4210
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
4210
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:54 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 12:13:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
4210
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Preliminary Conceptual Approach to Recovery of Endangered Fish Species In The Upper Colorado River Basin
USFW Year
1985.
USFW - Doc Type
Draft.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ x <br />;Fyi, <br />~` <br />. ~, <br />~i <br />e <br />r ~~ <br />~~`` ' <br />DRAFT-05/10/85 <br />3. Construction of a water project results in <br />blockage of a stream's channel such that the range <br />of the endangered fish is reduced.significantl~ in <br />an area which~is known to be essential for the <br />continued survival of the species. <br />Therefore, mitigation'"Erequirements would be limited to <br />projects having direct physical_im~act on important areas <br />for endangered species, and. reasonable alternatives must be <br />developed which are related to the direct impacts. Under an <br />effective recovery plan, depletion of water under State <br />water rights administration systems would not adversely <br />affect the species. <br />5.3 REASONABLE AND PRUDENT ALTERNATIVES <br />Tn specifying reasonable and prudent alternatives for <br />projects directly impacting endangered fish species, the <br />Fish and Wildlife Service, i.e, the Secretary. should <br />consider project impacts on a case by case basis. <br />Alternatives should be defined to directly mitigate impacts <br />_.... <br />.,~.. <br />of projects or to provide indirect mitigation so as not to <br />jeopardize the continued existence of the endangered <br />species. The type of alternative recommended should depend <br />upon the degree of impact of the specific project. The <br />kinds of alternatives which should be considered include: <br />Alteration of project facilities to mitigate <br />significant temperature impacts. <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.