Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />The issue we ought to be discussing, therefore, is not one <br />of hindsight. The question is not whether the policies of the <br />era of manifest destiny were right for those times. The question <br />is whether they are right for these times. <br />Two or three decades after the turn of the century, <br />disparate events began to take hold and gradually create a <br />society and climate increasingly at odds with the old policies. <br />You are well familiar with the forces that changed societal atti- <br />tudes. The boom-and-bust mentality fueled by the "take-it-now" <br />laws left too many western towns in shambles. The stress of <br />population growth became ever more visible on landscapes from Los <br />Angeles to the Front Range. Deep economic currents veered away <br />from the heavy extractive industries toward lighter local econo- <br />mies oriented toward recreation and tourism. Our supplies of <br />resources began to dwindle. In the field of water, for example, <br />we hear the generality that "most of the best reservoir sites <br />have been used up." The actual numbers lend depth to that <br />generality. Before 1930, the dams produced 10.4 acre-feet of <br />water for each cubic yard of dam volume. In the 1930's, the <br />ratio dropped to 2.1 acre-feet/cubic yard. Since World War II, <br />the ratio has dropped to .3 acre-feet/cubic yard. This means <br />that the recent dams are just 1/7 as efficient as the dams of the <br />1930's and are 1/30 as efficient as the dams before 1930. <br />We are a practical people and we react to lunchpail issues <br />and to close-to-home events and pressures. But we are also a <br />thinking people and our minds and destinies can be turned by <br />-5-