Laserfiche WebLink
<br />fee. A commercial fisher must pay a substantial license fee. A <br />company mining for coal, oil, or gas must pay royalties to the <br />government. Only in the case of water and hardrock minerals is <br />no fee required. Second, the state and federal governments not <br />only allowed free appropriation of western water, they also sub- <br />sidized development through a multi-billion-dollar dam and canal <br />building program in which the United States recovered only a <br />small fraction of the cost. The states participated by <br />establishing special water districts, such as the conservancy <br />districts, that subsidized private water development through tax- <br />exempt bonds, revenue-raising authority, and other mechanisms. <br />Third, water users have imposed extensive costs on other private <br />users and on the public in the form of various forms of water <br />pollution, but water developers have almost never been held <br />accountable for these externalities. <br />It needs to be underscored that this far-flung program of <br />subsidized, laissez faire development of western resources was <br />probably a good thing for its time, even if it did depart from <br />market principles and even if it did favor private development to <br />the near-total exclusion of any public interest as we conceive of <br />it today. The country needed water projects. It needed to hold <br />out hope to people in the East who wanted to head out over the <br />horizon toward a new start. Strong measures were needed and they <br />worked, at least in the sense that they were necessary and <br />appropriate to fulfilling the government's clearly-enunciated <br />policy to open the American West for settlement by non-Indians <br />and to develop a true coast-to-coast economy and society. <br />-4-