My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4101
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
4101
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:54 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 12:12:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
4101
Author
Mobil.
Title
Summary of Technical and Procedural Concerns.
USFW Year
1984.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'D <br /> <br />Obligations Under The Reclamation Laws To <br />Obtain Reimbursement For Construction Cost~? ......... 40 <br /> <br />2. Will BOR Operate Its Existing Upper Colorado <br />River Reservoirs, Such As Ruedi And Green <br />Mountain Reservoirs, So As Not Only To <br />Avoid Jeopardizing The Continued Existence <br />Of The Species, But Also To Use The Reservoir <br />t!aters To Promote The Recovery Of The Endangered <br />Fish And To Restore Them To A Non-Endangered <br /> <br />S tat us ? ~.........."""""".""""""""""""""",,.,,"""""""",,. 4 2. <br /> <br />3. How Is FWS Processing The BOR's Ruedi Reservoir <br />Consultation Request As Compared With The Oil <br />Shale Proj~cts Currently Undergoing Consulta- <br /> <br />t i on ? """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" lJ 4 <br /> <br />IX. Can ~~S Demonstrate That MAEI's Proposed Project Has Any <br />Neasurable Impact On The Endangered Species? (This <br />Is Not The Question Of ~~ether A Measurablp Impact <br />Would Jeopardize The Continued Existence Of The <br />Species. Rather, Can FWS Demonstrate Th~t the Parachute <br />Project Has Any MpBsurable Impact At All. Once <br />"Impact" Is Established, It Is Assumed ~VS \01111 "Err <br />On The Side Of The Species" In Determining Whether <br />Such Impact Is Likely To Jeopardize The Continued <br />Existence Of The Speci.es. ................................. 46 <br /> <br />x. Is The Present Goal Of The FWS Coordinated Colorado <br />River Endangered Species Co~ittee A <br />Conservation Plan Or An Administrative Implementation <br /> <br />F Ian? """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""",,"""""""""""""" 4 8 <br /> <br />XI. Fish Studies, Past And Present, Are Reportedly To Be <br />Rescoped And Redefined In October 1984. How Will <br />These Studi~s Be Funded And Will The Scientific <br />Community Be Solicited For Rescoping Input? ............... 50 <br /> <br />XII. Has The TI~S Coordinating Committpc Resolved The <br />Issue Of Involving The Lower Basin States In The <br />Resolution Of The Endangered Fish Species Problem? ........ )1 <br /> <br />**Those questions preceded by double asterisks were listed in the <br />discussion paper distributed at Y~I's June 25, 1984 meeting with <br />Deputy Assistant Secretary Craig Potter. To date, MAEI has received <br />no formal response to any of these questions, although FWS has <br />provided oral assurance that answers are forthcoming. <br /> <br />- ~ ),\.1,fj,. ---------- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.