Laserfiche WebLink
<br />29 <br /> <br />Scenario 7: The capacity of the Gunnison Tunnel was increased from 1122 <br /> <br />to 1300 cfs arid the patterrl of irrigat iCIYI di versiorls factored up. (See <br /> <br />Appendi)( B.) <br /> <br />Scenario 8: The demand pattern for 45,000 acre feet of M&I releases from <br /> <br />Blue Mesa was compressed to August and September in the 80~ exceedance dry <br /> <br />years. This pattern places greater demands on Blue Mesa in the dry years <br /> <br />and in the late summer when irrigation demands are high. It also provides <br /> <br />less berlefit to mirlirnum stream flows, since the erltire 45,000 acre fc'cot <br /> <br />supply is delivered in just two months when releases are often also made <br /> <br />for endangered fishes. <br /> <br />Scenario 9: The staff of the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCBl <br /> <br />provided target levels for Blue Mesa storage which lowered early winter <br /> <br />reservoir contents so as to mitigate the ice jam problem at the inlet to <br /> <br />Blue Mesa during this time of the year. The CWCB targets were based on <br /> <br />the USBR targets without arlY adjustmet.t for the Taylor Park exchaYlge. The <br /> <br />CWCB targets were accordingly adjusted in the same way as the USBR targets <br /> <br /> <br />to account for the Taylor Park exchange and the adjusted CWCB targets <br /> <br /> <br />shown in Table 7 were examined in this scenario. <br /> <br />TABLE 7: CWCB Blue Mesa Storage Targets (1000 acre feet) <br /> <br />334 <br /> <br />Apr <br />368 <br /> <br />Mav <br />538 <br /> <br />Jun <br /> <br />Jul <br />824 <br /> <br />AUQ <br />780 <br /> <br />SeD <br />720 <br /> <br />Oct <br />660 <br /> <br />Nov <br /> <br />571 <br /> <br />Dec <br /> <br />516 <br /> <br />Jan <br /> <br />Feb <br />389 <br /> <br />Mar <br /> <br />443 <br /> <br />748 <br /> <br />WBLA, Inc. 1909 Broadway, #3, Boulder, Colorado 80302 <br />