Laserfiche WebLink
Potential for Iniu <br />The Applicants' plan for augmentation may not be adequate to replace diversions andlor depletions <br />in tiine, location and asnount to prevent injury to the Board's instreain flow water rights. Also, the <br />Applicants' proposed out-of-priority diversion may injure the instream flow water rights. <br />Other Obiectors <br />Statements of Opposition were also filed by the City of Aurora; Grand Valley Water Users <br />Association; Orchard Mesa Irrigation District; Ute Water Conservancy District; Northern <br />Colorado Water Conservancy District; City of Colorado Springs - Utilities; City of Aspen; <br />Hoinestake Partners (Cities of Colorado Springs and City of Aurora acting through the <br />Hoinestake Steering Coininittee); Traer Creek Metropolitan District; Cliinax Molybdenuin <br />Company; Public Service of Colorado; Town of Gypsum; the Town of Avon; the State and <br />Division Engineers; and the Board of County Coininissioners of Pitkin County. <br />