Laserfiche WebLink
Rep. Young: Thank you Mr. Chairman. The only reason you would want to vote, to <br />keep this amendment on is if you want it delayect another step in the process with the idea <br />that maybe there is just one little reason why it might not get adopted back into the senate <br />so there is no reason for this to really to go on there and I said before the idea was when staff gets it matter consistency they don't look at the house and seaate rules and say is <br />this going to go through in a certain kind of way, we're the one that make the decisions . <br />on that they brought the amendment in well it needs to be done and we. offered it and <br />adopted it, purely for the reason tha.t it was a way to keep a consistency with what we've . <br />done the titles before. It has nothing to do with the rule we don't ha.ve to adopt this report <br />--to have-the bill go thtough but it does cause'one more step to have to be done, and fhat- is <br />the senate will have to concur with house amendment. And we don't have to ga through <br />that step. Again its-not matter whether its witb.in the rules it was just a process that.we <br />went through at the time, it didn.'t occur to me that what we might want to do is make . <br />sure it goes through little bit faster so we did adopt the amendment but it doesn't have <br />. anything to do with substance of the bill which, its just the change in the title. So I'm <br />.going to ask for rej ection of this committee report and I hope unlike sometimes in the ' <br />past tha.t members of my caucus aze listening to the debate down here and paying <br />attention. • <br />Chaiiman: Fwrther discussion on Senate Bill 216, is Representative Plant. <br />Rep. Plant: Thank you, I' m not certain what the feaz of is of the concurrence by the <br />senate I mean this is I' ll tell yau right now, I. think this is a change in water law, <br />obviously something that in Colorado we take very seriously I don't know why were so <br />fearfial that the senate is going to either concur or not concur. Its going to go to <br />conference on it, this is what bills go through all the time. I'm not sure what the fear is <br />here and tlus is something that was adopted in the appropriation committee just <br />yesterday, seems like the only reasan to rej ect this is because the sponsor is afraid that its <br />not going stand up to the mustard of concurrence and I don't see tha.t's necessarily the <br />case.: I urge a yes vote.. , . ,. _ _ . . <br />Chairman: Representative Spradley <br />Rep. Spradley: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, well representative Plant you've voted against <br />this bill at every step in the process so far and so I think your motives are some what. I. <br />will withdraw that, under my own rule. Okay, I think you've voted I only stated the fact <br />you voted against t11is bill every step of the way. This is a technical issue its changing the <br />title, the title does not become part of the statute, the tifle does not become. It is what it is <br />and that it allows us to do tb.e process here. It simply shortens the title. I ask for a no <br />vote. • Chairman: Further discussion on the appropriation committee report. The request before <br />us is the adoption of the appropriation report. All in favor say I, Vote: I ' <br /> <br />... . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .2 . . . .. .