Laserfiche WebLink
TRANSCRIPT OF SB 216 (2001) May 8, 2001,11:21 a.m. through 12:07 p.m. <br />Clerk: Reading of the bill (too fast to understand) <br />Chairman: Rep. Spradley. • <br />Rep. Spra.dley: Thank you Mr. Chairman I move SB 216 and I move the appropriations <br />committee report. <br />Clerk: To the appropriations committee report, Rep. Spradley. Rep. Spradley: Thank you Mr. Chairman. The appropriations committee report did one <br />thing and tha.t was they shortened the titled and deleted the words "in making an <br />. agpropriation therefore". I am going to ask you to reject the appropriations committee <br />report because wha.t that will do for the title and for the- shortening in the last step of this <br />process, send it back to the senate in the last 24 hours for concurrence and I just think <br />this is a step we don't need to put the body through, so I am going to... It is not like the <br />bill is moving through the process fu.rther and tb.at this would have any impact on how the <br />bill is assigned or anything else, this is the very last step and so I would ask for a no vote. <br />Chairman: Further discussion? Representative Young. <br />Rep. Young: Thank you Mr. Chairman. I checked and.there really is no reason that we <br />have to change the title at this point. Under normal circumstances the bill goes through <br />when the JB C staff appropriations committee staff looks at the bill and tries to make sure <br />they aze absolutely 140% correct. They iook for these kind of differences to make sure <br />that the title meets with exaatly whats in the bill and under this situation they looked and <br />said there should not be this language in the bill tifle thi.ng appropriations. It doesn't need <br />to be done, it is not absolutely necessary given the late nature of the bill right now. I <br />think that is a good idea and just go ahead and get rid of this amendment so that it can go <br />back to senate and does not have to go through another step in the process to get the bill <br />adopted. So I also would encourage a rejection of the appropriations eommittee report <br />and ask for a no vote on its adoption. , <br />Clerlc: Further discussion on the appropriations committees' report. Representative <br />Plant. . ' <br />Rep. Plant: I would ask for an i vote on the appropriations committee report This is <br />. . . . . . .ICind of.iutezesting - this came to the appropriations, committee.yesterday, passed. . . . . . imani*n ously. At the time it was considered, it was a staff amendment, and Rep. Young . <br />had said that staff said we don't need this, but that was what I was understanding you <br />saying but this amendment was prepazed by staff wluch indicates to me that it is needed <br />and neceasary in order,to be consistent with our rules down here. -So I would urge. a yes <br />vote on the appropriations committee report. • <br />Chairman: Rep. Young <br />-9 <br />? EXHIBIT <br />L