My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Amici Curiae Brief of Northwest Colorado Council of Governments, Town of Minturn, Grand County, Gunnison County, Pitkin County
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
Amici Curiae Brief of Northwest Colorado Council of Governments, Town of Minturn, Grand County, Gunnison County, Pitkin County
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:41:41 PM
Creation date
7/29/2009 2:36:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.2F
Description
Colorado Supreme Court Appeal
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
4
Date
9/29/2004
Author
Barbara Green, Anne Castle, John M. Ely, David Baumgarten
Title
Amici Curiae Brief of Northwest Colorado Council of Governments, Town of Minturn, Grand County, Gunnison County, Pitkin County
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Colorado Economic Chronicle observed in its Apri12004 newsletter that C'olorado's rafting <br />industry reported. a forty-five percent (45%) increase in business in 2003, the liLrgest jump in <br />fifteen (15) year:,, despite the drought. Colorado Legislative Council, Coloradi) Economic <br />Chronicle, p. 5(ikpril, 29, 2004) (attached as Exhibit A). In spite of these treni3s, the State <br />through the CW(:B is spending significant taxpayer monies to fight appropriations for RICD <br />water rights that are a means to promote and protect investments in the water-t?ased recreation <br />economy that beiiefits a11 of Colorado. <br />Recreatianal in-channel activities are a national trend and communities aze fighting to <br />draw tourist dollars into their cities and towns. "In the last few years, about 2_`i communities <br />including Wausau, Wis.; Pittsford, N.Y.; and the Colorado cities of Boulder, L>enver, Vail and <br />Steamboat Springs have re-engineered the waterways coursing through their nudst to create the <br />rapids, riffles and `play holes' that white-water kayakers appreciate. Missoula, Mont.; Boise, <br />Idaho; and Willnmantic, Conn., are among a growing number of cities pushing to ].iven up their <br />waterways - and city coffers." Ashley Powers, There's C'rold in the Spills, L.A. 'Times, <br />September 13, 2004 (atta.ched as Exhibit B). The article reports that Charlotte, North Carolina <br />has proposed a$25 million artificial white-water course that economic expert-, believe will <br />generate $37 mi]lion annually. Id. The kayak park in Golden, Colorado geneirates between $1.4 <br />and 2 million ansually. Evidently, the financial benefits associated with these kayak pazks are a <br />boon to these loc:al economies. <br />Not only do recreational amenities, like ka.yak parks, expand government coffers, they <br />also reinvigorate the community by creating a focal point on the river, which im tum generates <br />pride in the com;nunity and promotes local businesses. Where governments build expensive <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.