Laserfiche WebLink
witaess was going to be answering the question asked Qf an eazlier <br />witness for the same party. And therefore, I wondered whether it <br />might not make sense, in terms of efficiency, to do it tliis way. However, sometimes questions get forgotten. So I think it can be - it <br />can go erther way. - <br />Don Schwindt: "C`rreg? <br />Greg Ho skin: IwM prefer to ask questions of the witnesses just as they're finishing <br />because you do have the questions in mind and you can get an interchange at that time with the entire background in mind. f know <br />it mi.ght take a little longer that way, but I tbink it might be better as <br />faz as getdng the answers we needed. Don Schwiadt: - Eric? <br /> <br />Eric Wilkinson: I would concur with that. I would lke to see an opportunity to ask <br />, ea.ch presenter questions at thE enc} of their pre5entation. And tf that <br />. presenter 14.no'ws that the material covered by that question will be <br />cnYered by someone subsequeatlY, then #tat-would-be-fiae as well, <br />just defer to #he subsequent witness. But I would sure hce the <br />opporhmity to question each wiiness. . I <br />? xa.y wxigbt: However, if we follow-#he pattern that we did 'm Pueblo vyhere-the . <br />pubfic would submit questions, I guess I might tlunk that limiting the <br />- linoiting any off band questions to questions from the board might <br />be betteF and to ha.ve questions cdming from the general public to <br />„ - accur at the end of the entire presentatian.--1 think that the submittal <br />of hand-written questions-in that process wautd-be kind of <br />cuinbersome as we go through [unurtelligible] <br />Maa: Your comment, Ray, causes me ta glance down the agenda and, I. <br />guess sitice you're here I'll just ask you, vvhere do we have in #his <br />agenda the place for parties to submit a questian to other parties? <br />FeliCity Hannay: The paragraph number five descn`bes -that process.'And the idea was <br />. that it wouid happen at the same time after the presentation by the <br />staff and by the Division Engineer, the questions would come &om <br />. the board to those people and also at that time, the [crosstalk] <br />. questions from the parties to other parties would also be posed at that <br />time. I asked the parties to let m,e lcno?w if there going to be <br />' vvitnesses who would not be aval7a.ble in that way. - Anct the only <br />communication I received was from Trou# Unlimited, whose witaess <br />wfl1 only be able to testify at the time that their -- their presentaxion. <br />And so at that time, if there aze questions from other parties, we <br />might want to consider giving those at that time, rather than waiting <br />CoZorado Water Conservation Board• <br />September 10, 2002 Hearing Transcript <br />' - Page 3