Laserfiche WebLink
.? guidance from this boazd, F said that I thought we wauld handle <br />cross-examination without rt ha.ving it be daect cross-examination <br />but rather with written questions. And that's all iacluded witbin this <br />4rder, -as we1L But I want to let you know 13at whatever l do in a <br />pre-hearing context is simply a recommendation to this boatd. It <br />dqesu't bind you, so if you would wazLt to change any of those <br />recommendations, you are very free to do so. <br />The agencia proposed for the hearing -an,d the order of presentation <br />was generally - was discussed at the pre-hearing conferenee and was <br />generally agreed to, atthaugh the actual times given were derived by <br />me, after consideration of what ha.d been said at the pire-hearing <br />conference. The times allowed were based generally on the amaunt <br />of time requested by each parly, each parly understood that it was a <br />good thing Yo txy ta foreshorten that - the preseaitatians, if possi'ble. <br />And sa this is rea}ly - this reaU,y amounts to what we hope Would be <br />a maximum, rather than a minimmm, of'the amounx of time taken by <br />esch pazty: A,nd the pubuC comments portion was scheduled at a tJme certain <br />from 4:55 to 5:25, with the hope that that would allow members of <br />the public to be able #o plan their time arownd their schedutes and <br />know that that would ha.ppen then; no matter where we aze ui the <br />heazing, that that public comuent session is -- we more or less <br />proinised to start it a# that time and hold that tim available for it. <br />Besides that, T don't think I have any other cbmmerts. The hearriuig <br />agenda appears onpage three, as I proposed it. And i£the members <br />•'of the board laave changes they'd Ike to make, I think that woutd be <br />in order at tbis pomt. <br />Dan Schwindt: Fqr your information, just - I've had a brief cowmsation dvith the <br />applicant involved in the main presenter. I don't kaow if t?at's the <br />aPPropiiate title or not. But betvveen - tbat's scheduled for between <br />14 and I:30. We'll tty and schedute - make a break $chedule before <br />- b8iween now and lanch. And we'll try and break for lunch An.d <br />then the question tha# she had far us is, do we vvaut to leave . <br />quesanns Ear all af tbeir witnesses to the end or do we want to take <br />them up as witnesses finish I guess my suggestion, in terms of <br />keeping us an time, might he to 3eave fhem tii the end, but t?.at's a <br />-bioard call. . <br />Feficity Hannay: Nit. Cbairman, I tbink 4 is the board's call. And I Itnow that <br />sometimes it's usefiil ta ask a question in the finmediacy of the <br />momenL I noticed, myselt during the previous hearing on the <br />[tminteIligi'ble] RICD application that firequently a snbsequent <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />September 10, 2002:Hearing Transcript <br />Paqe 2 *