Laserfiche WebLink
ao <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />with Colorado Conservation Board? <br />A I don't have additional education, but I would say I <br />have additional experience with regard to RICDs. <br />Q Could you describe that experience, please. <br />A Certainly. The first instance was with regard to the <br />Golden matter. And, as I indicated, I became knowledgeable of <br />this treatise written by Bo Shelby called Instream Flows for <br />Recreation: a Handbook on Concepts and Research Methods. And, <br />after reading that, there are a number of different ways to <br />objectively set what flows are appropriate for what <br />recreational opportunities. After reading that document, and <br />under the instruction of the board, I hired Mr. Bo Shelby, who <br />authored that treatise, if you will. I was the project <br />manager with regard to that litigation. And Mr. Bo Shelby was <br />under my direction with regard to the development of his <br />testimony with regard to the type of way in which we <br />identified it was -- in which we identified what were <br />appropriate flows for what recreational opportunities. <br />There's different ways to identify what flows are appropriate <br />for different recreational opportunities. There's a <br />professional judgment method where you rely on one expert. <br />MS. COVELL: Objection. I think we're getting more <br />testimony again, Your Honor. <br />MS. COULTER: I think he's describing his additional <br />education with respect to RICDs.