Laserfiche WebLink
11 <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />that we're unable to resolve it, assisting in the development <br />of litigation strategy and presenting arguments before water <br />courts related to the CWCB's interests. <br />I want to also state that there is another reason <br />why -- there are a number of other reasons why the board or <br />why I choose for the board to file a statement of opposition <br />in my role as a legal protection specialist for the board. <br />And one instance related to that is the CWCB is statutorily <br />proscribed as the exclusive authority to appropriate instream <br />flows. <br />MS. COVELL: Objection, Your Honor. This is going <br />far beyond Mr. Kowalski's qualifications. He's testifying <br />about what he's probably going to testify about as we go on <br />with the case. <br />THE COURT: I think last question was: And your last <br />job after the Colorado Attorney General's Office was. You may <br />be ready for another question. <br />MS. COULTER: I think he was describing his duties, <br />and some of the duties involve legal aspects. And I see no <br />reason for an objection if he's describing the legal aspects <br />of his duties. <br />THE COURT: Well, it seemed like he was about to <br />answer the philosophy on when he raises statements of <br />opposition or certain statements of opposition. <br />MS. COULTER: Okay.