My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Prehearing Statement of the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Summit, CO
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Prehearing Statement of the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Summit, CO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:41:24 PM
Creation date
7/24/2009 2:03:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.51A2
Description
Objectors' Prehearing Statements
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/3/2005
Author
Stephen M. Mathis, Ron Holliday
Title
Prehearing Statement of the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Summit, CO
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Litigation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br />PREI3EARING STATEMENT OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY <br />COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF SUMMIT, COLORADO <br />CONCERNING THE APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS FOR A <br />RECREATIONAL 1N-CHANNEL DIVERSION OF THE TOWN OF <br />SILVERTHORNE IN SUMMIT COUNTY <br />The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Summit, Colorado <br />("Summit County"), by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby submits this <br />Prehearing Statement for the July 20, 2005 hearing before the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board ("CWCB"), regarding the application for a Recreational In-Channel <br />Diversion ("RICD") filed by the Town of Silverthorne ("Silverthorne") in Case No. <br />04CW217, District Court, Water Division No. 5. <br />1. INTRODUCTION <br />Generally, Summit County supports the efforts of Silverthorne to develop the <br />Blue River Whitewater Course. However, Summit County is concerned about the <br />potential for the RICD to adversely impact several water projects in which Summit <br />County and other entities are involved. These projects aze part of a plan to meet the - <br />future water needs of Summit County, including growing demand in the.portion of the <br />County above Dillon Dam and the RICD. Such projects are more fu11y discussed in the <br />Prehearing Statement and exhibits filed by the Colorado River Water Conservation <br />District ("River District"). Summit County concurs with the River District's position <br />and, accordingly, adopts the arguments raised in the River District's Prehearing <br />Statement and incorporates the same as if fully set forth herein. <br />H. FACTUAL AND LEGAL ISSUES <br />Whether the adiudication and administration of Silverthorne's RICD would <br />promote maximum utilization of the waters of the State. <br />1. Silverthorne's Prehearing Statement, at page 3, states that "[o]ver ninety- <br />six percent of the Colorado River drainage bmin is below the Silverthorne RICD." <br />However, the remaining four percent of the Colorado River drainage basin, above the <br />RICD, is wholly located in a rapidly growing area of Summit County. According to the <br />Phase II Upper Colorado River Study ("UPCO"), Summit County will require , <br />approximately 7900 acre-feet of additional water supply annually to satisfy future <br />estimated demands at buildout. UPCO Phase II Report, Page ii (attached as Exhibit B to <br />the River District's Prehearing Statement). Approximately twenty-five percent of this <br />additional future demand will be attributable to that portion of the County located above <br />the Silverthorne RICD. Id.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.