Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />Outline for Continued Work on the Adaptive Management <br />Background <br />After discussing the Platte River Program adaptive management process with the <br />Adaptive Management Advisory Group it is clear to me that it is necessary to reorganize <br />the material describing adaptive management in support of the Program Document. <br />Originally the Integrated Monitoring and Research Plan (IMRP) was meant simply as a <br />description of Program monitoring and research. The document contains a brief <br />description of adaptive management but lacks the detail necessary to implement an <br />adaptive management plan. Some of the detail has been developed in the past but was left <br />out or removed from the IMRP, partially because it didn't seem to fit within the broader <br />context of the document. <br />I believe the solution is to create a Platte River Program Adaptive Management Plan. I <br />also think that the outline for such a plan suggested by Scott McBain and edited by Ed <br />Hanna is a reasonable place to start. I concur with Scott's comments about the time <br />needed to produce an AM Plan. There is neither the time nor the staff to complete a <br />detailed Adaptive Management Plan before the NEPA and ESA process is complete. The <br />material we are working on now will be included in an AM Plan that provides a broad <br />overview of the adaptive management program, and likely will replace the IMRP as <br />"Attachment 3" within the Program document. In effect the existing IMRP becomes <br />section VI in Scott's outline. This document needs to be completed by approximately <br />March l, 2005. A more comprehensive and detailed adaptive management plan will be <br />developed during the first year of the First Increment of the Program. <br />The Document <br />The current consultation process with the AM consultants should focus on getting the GC <br />started on the development of the broad overview document. I believe the document <br />should be based on the same outline as the more detailed plan. It should contain as much <br />detail as possible on each section and provide a discussion of what the more detailed plan <br />would contain and a process and timeline for adding the detail. For example, the AM <br />Plan we are working on now would contain items such as <br />• Existing Program goals and objectives <br />• The existing organizational structure and illustration of information flow and a <br />decision process(e.g., show the feedback loop and mechanism), identification of <br />decision makers <br />• Conceptual ecosystem model(s) (CEM) for habitat compleYes (Table 1 items from <br />the Land Plan) and alternative habitat (Table 2 in the Land Plan) and their <br />relationship to habitat needs of the three target bird species, priority linkages <br />within the CEM, and linkage to management model(s) <br />• CEM for the pallid sturgeon and the relationship of its habitat to flows in the <br />central Platte River, priority linkages within the CEM, and linkage to <br />management model(s) <br />• A description of the existing hypotheses (including competing hypotheses) that <br />the IMRP is based on and potential hypotheses that are "nested" within the CEMs