My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Endangered Species Cooperative Agreement & Water Action Plan
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
Endangered Species Cooperative Agreement & Water Action Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:39:23 PM
Creation date
6/23/2009 9:42:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8561.550
Description
Water Advisory Committee & Water Advisory Planning
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Author
Kent Holsinger, Rick Brown, Randy Seaholm
Title
Endangered Species Cooperative Agreement & Water Action Plan
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Correspondence
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br />To: Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />From: Rick Brown, Platte River Coordinator, Interstate Streams Investigation <br />Randy Seaholm, Chief, Interstate Streams Investigation <br />Date: July 17, 2000 <br />Subject: Agenda Item 19.d., July 24-25, 2000 Board Meeting. Platte River <br />Endangered Species Cooperative Agreement. <br />1. Introduction <br />In 1997 the Governors of the states of Colorado, Nebraska and Wyoming signed an agreement with <br />the Department of Interior to improve and/or study the habitat of four endangered species in the <br />Central Platte River in Nebraska. The proposed program has three components: water, land, and <br />monitoring and research. This memorandum will highlight the status of the negotiations and <br />summarize some of the key activities of several of the Cooperative Agreement (CA) Committees. <br />II. Status of Negotiations <br />Negotiation of a long-term agreement could begin as early as January 2001. Colorado's willingness <br />to enter into negotiations is of coarse contingent on the acceptability of the proposed program <br />elements, and the outcome of the National Environmental Policy Act evaluation process. <br />III. Status of Cooperative Agreement Activities <br />The focus of our work effort over the last two months has begun to shift from individual committee <br />activities to assembling the individual pieces into a"proposed program" which can undergo <br />National Environmental Policy Act evaluation. As we begin to assemble the proposed program it <br />is apparent that considerable work has been completed. However, we have also identified many <br />tasks which are not complete and there is some concern that some of these tasks may be rolled <br />forward as work tasks to be completed during the implementation of the proposed program. <br />Our challenge is to complete as much work as possible in order to increase the level of certainty <br />associated with the proposed program. However, in some cases there is either insufficient time <br />andlor limited information to make definitive decisions. In these cases it may make sense to move <br />completion of the tasks forward. We will continue to carefully assess the level of detail and <br />certainty that Colorado can accept. <br />A brief summary of the status of important individual committee activities is provided below: <br />• The Water Action Plan was once again the center of attention. In May and June we saw the <br />three states pull together and reach the water goal of 130,000-150,000 acre feet! The precise <br />quantity of water is being defined by modeling efforts but we have confidence that we will at <br />least make the lower limit.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.