Laserfiche WebLink
? the anticipated channel maintenance, sandbar formation and other benefits, and EA <br />content remains limited, back-to-back pulse flow releases may not be judged to be the <br />highest priority use of EA water. <br />(4) Other Circumstances: As discussed in the Program Water Management Process <br />document, a request for reregulation and EA bypass may be needed to test the <br />effectiveness of alternative flow routing strategies, particularly during earlier, <br />experimental EA releases. <br />Pulse Flow Implementation <br />A separate Excel worksheet is provided as part of the WI'08 AOP (it is too wide to include a <br />readable copy in this document). The supporting documentation for the worksheet is included in <br />Appendix F (pages 37-41). <br />The worksheet may be used to generally illustrate potential pulse flow release scenarios from the <br />Environmental Account in Lake McConaughy on a daily time-step, assuming known system <br />inflows, river gains, and how gains are anticipated to fluctuate with increases and decreases in <br />river flow. Transit losses (or conveyance factors) for the NPPD and CNPPID canals and the river <br />are also assumed to be known and specified by the user. Two-day travel times are assumed <br />between Lake McConaughy and the North Platte River/South Platte River confluence, and <br />between the confluence/CNPPID diversion and Overton, whether via the Platte River or through <br />the CNPPID system. Therefore, the worksheet is not intended to be a real-time simulation tool, <br />• but may be used to gain insight as to how to sequence EA releases with the Districts operations, <br />given the above assumptions, to produce a pulse flow at the Platte River near Overton gage. <br />An EA pulse flow release in WY08, and the actual peak flow attained at the Overton gage area, <br />will be heavily influenced by local weather, river baseflow conditions, losses, and attenuation in <br />the Platte River paralleling the CNPPID system. Thus, the example scenario should be viewed in <br />that context. <br />Description of EA Operations Utilizing Johnson Lake Reregulation and Intentional EA B??ass at <br />the CNPPID Diversion <br />1) EA releases are increased at the conservative ramp rate of 300 cfs per day from Lake <br />McConaughy. During an EA pulse flow release, no other releases of CNPPID or NPPD <br />project water are anticipated, due to operation in "conservation mode" to maximize <br />storage in Lake McConaughy. No EA diversions are anticipated due to "conservation <br />mode" operation by NPPD in 2008. Total flow at the North Platte River at North Platte <br />gage should remain at or below the NWS flood-level of 1,980 cfs (stage = 5.7 ft). <br />2) Prior to the flow rate at the North Platte River gage reaching its maximum, EA water is <br />delivered to Johnson Lake for temporary reregulation. <br />? 3) EA water is also bypassed at the CNPPID diversion to "wet up" the main Platte River <br />channel. The maximum EA Bypass at the CNPPID diversion occurs when flows are <br />greatest at the North Platte River gage. <br />Water Year 2008 EA AOP 14 October 15, 2007