Laserfiche WebLink
Approach to Alternatives and Preliminary Gap Analysis <br />For example, categories of projects for the Gunnison Basin will be separated by • <br />upper and lower basin projects. <br />? 0VYtsa -?PrNe1 ?tSmy e0.vho(-. ? <br />Y? Xa,? ns;?R vjP,y? J <br />3. For each category of projects, each will be scored u&iug the performance measures resµlGS <br />developed for each objective/sub-objective (see AttachmentA). a,,W <br />3 <br />4. The categories of projects will then be evaluated based on the scoring from step 4 <br />and if some of the categories score very low they may be modified or eliminated <br />from the remaining analyses. <br />5. The categories of projects will then be combined to create "themes." Themes are <br />the basis for building alternatives or the most prominent component of a grouping <br />of projects. Examples of themes include a reservoir construction theme, demand <br />management theme, transfer theme, geographically diverse theme, or protect <br />environment and recreation theme. <br />6. These alternatives are then scored based on the performance measures and <br />preferences of the basin roundtable members. <br />7. The alternatives and scoring will be presented to the basin roundtables for <br />discussion. <br />8. Through the roundtable process, alternatives will be ranked for each basin ? <br />roundtable participant. The counts of how many times a certain altemative ranks <br />number 1, are within top two, and within the top three ranks will be examined <br />closely to identify the common projects within the alternatives. Those common <br />projects will be brought back to the roundtables in order to facilitate consensus. <br />• <br />Cm DYtAFT <br />2 <br />S:Vvteetirgs\CWCB BoartMttemative-Appmach3.doc