My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Tamarack Negotiation with Boulder/Centennial
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Tamarack Negotiation with Boulder/Centennial
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:37:47 PM
Creation date
6/8/2009 10:31:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.400
Description
SPWRAP
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
9/18/2008
Author
Steve Sims
Title
Tamarack Negotiation with Boulder/Centennial
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2.0 APT TESTING ANALYSIS SUMMARY <br />Two APTs were conducted on the lower South Platte River to determine streambed and aquifer parameters. The <br />Stieb APT was located approximately 8 miles upstream ofthe TRSWA and the Dinsdale APT was located <br />immediately downstream of the TRSWA. Analysis of these tests was performed by the following entities: <br />• Colorado State University, (CSU, 2005 and 2006) <br />• Hydrosphere Resource Consultants for the City of Boulder (Hydrosphere, 2006) <br />• Water & Environmental Systems Technology, Inc. for the City of Centennial (W&EST, 2006) <br />• CDOW (CDOW, 2005) <br />Table 1 summarizes the aquifer and streambed parameters derived by these parties for both the Stieb and <br />Dinsdale tests. <br />Table 1 <br />Lower South Platte River APT <br />Analyses Summary <br /> <br />Analyses , <br />Kh <br />Kh1Kv2 Specifc <br />Yield Specifc <br />Stora e <br />9 Streambed <br />Leakanoe <br />Ksb /M <br /> feeVday nones feeUfeet feet-1 day'?6? <br />Stieb Test <br />CSU Groundwater Model' 400 10 0.15 5.0E-05 775 <br />CDOW Analyticat Method 275-320 10 0.2 2.0E-04 n/a <br />Hydrosphere Theis Method 255 0.15 1.74-2.33 <br />Hydrosphere Hunt Method 441 0.018- <br />0.017 1.66-4.16 <br />Hydrosphere ET Model 40Q 4 02 10-20 <br />Hydrosphere Recommended 400 4 0.2 20 <br />W&EST Analysis 300 0.1 1.69 <br />Dinsdale Test <br />CSU Groundwater Modele 310 7.75 0.125 5.OE-05 160-400 <br />CDOW Analytical Model 230-285 10-12.5 0.2 1.0E-04 n/a <br />Hydrosphere Theis Method 150 0.05 n/a <br />Hydrosphere Hunt Methodg 198-216 0.015- <br />0.013 0.024-2.6 <br />Hydrosphere MODFLOW model <br />(McCord June 2005) 450 02 1.0E-04 1.5 <br />Hydrosphere Recommended 200 4 0.05 2.6 <br />W&EST Analysis 100-260 0.125 0.011 <br />Table Notes: <br />1. Kh is defined as the horizontal hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer <br />2. Kv is defined as the vertical hydraulic canductivity of the aquifer <br />3. Ksb is defined as the hydraulic conductivity of the streambed <br />4. M is defined as the streambed thickness <br />5. Units for Kh/Kv are ft/day divided by ft/day which equates to a dimensionless parameter <br />6. Units for streambed leakance are ft/day divided by ft which simplifies to units of 1/day or day"' <br />7. A high conductivity zone was established very close to the river (K = 600 feeUday) <br />8. A high conductivity zone was established very close to the river (Kv = 80 feeUday) <br />9. Streambed leakance ranged widely depending on time of calibration Ksb/M ranged from 2.6 to 0.024 <br />days' depending on calibration point. <br />Page 2 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.