Laserfiche WebLink
Mary created depletion curves using the different leakance numbers and found that while there <br />was not much of a difference between 400 and 2.6, but there was between 2.6 and 0.011 (See <br />Leakage comparison chart.pd fl. <br />To give a perspective on how this factor fits with stream leakance used in other recent cases, <br />Mary contracted with Calvin Miller to create a table comparing the various cases in District 64 <br />(Millercomparison table.pd fl. This table does not have the most recent 120 feet per day figure <br />from the latest Logan Well Users case. <br />Finally, yesterday Mary prepared an analysis that looked at the impact on the volume of recharge <br />using both a 20 foot per day and a 2.6 foot per day stream leakance. This analysis <br />indicates <br />Summary. Using the 2.6 foot Boulder/Centennial stream leakance number will result in a lesser <br />amount of recharge accretions, but not a significantly less number. If Boulder/Centennial would <br />accept 2.6, 1 recommend settlement.