My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7850
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7850
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:47:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7850
Author
Hydrosphere Resource Consultants.
Title
Yampa River Basin Recommended Alternatives, Detailed Feasibility Study
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
Draft.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Reservoir Operating Studies <br /> <br /> <br />Elkhead Reservoir was modeled with a capacity of 13,700 af, as in the current conditions <br />scenario. With the exception of the demand level, all modeling assumptions and reservoir <br />operating rules were the same as those defined in the current conditions scenario. <br />Results <br />Water Deliveries <br /> <br /> <br />Total basin water shortages are more frequent in this model scenario than in the current <br />conditions scenario, occurring in 38 of the 53 years in the study period. Average annual total <br />shortage is 1,598 of and the maximum annual total shortage is 15,721 of occurring in 1934. <br />Most shortages are to agricultural demands though shortages to the coal-gasification plant are <br />also frequent. Municipal shortages occur only in very dry years. <br />' Reservoir Levels <br /> Figure 2-2 shows the end-of-month contents of the three modeled reservoirs. An <br /> increase in storage draft is evident in all reservoirs, but is most noticeable in Elkhead <br /> Reservoir. In 1934, the power contract pool in Elkhead is nearly depleted and there are fairly <br /> regular drafts on that supply in other dry years. Stagecoach experiences somewhat greater <br /> drawdown in dry years, though the annual cycling is still dominated by winter hydropower and <br /> environmental releases. <br />' Instream Flow Conditions <br /> Modeled flows below the reservoirs are similar to those predicted under current <br /> conditions. Flows below Steamboat Lake increase slightly in the late summer as some <br />deliveries are made to the Hayden Station. A similar increase is evident below Elkhead as <br /> industrial and municipal water users near Craig rely on storage releases to supplement direct <br />' flow water to meet their demands. <br /> Flows at Maybell are significantly reduced from current condition flows in the late <br /> summer through winter period. For example, median flows in September under current <br /> conditions are 112 cfs; with the 2040-level demands operating the median flow drops to 61 cfs. <br /> Occurrences of zero average monthly flow (an imprecise but useful indicator of flow <br /> conditions) increase from 5 under current conditions to 22 under future-without-project <br /> conditions. <br /> Table 2-7 presents the modeled 25th, 50th and 75th percentile flows at Maybell for the <br /> projected 2040 demand condition without enlargement of Elkhead Reservoir. Modeled median <br /> flows are lower than under current conditions for all months of the year; they are also lower <br /> than the recommended flows. Examination of the 75th percentile flows indicates that in one- <br /> fourth of Septembers, flows at Maybell would be less than 5 cfs; the 25th percentile indicates <br /> that September flows would be less than 130 cfs three-fourths of the time. Detailed results of <br /> this scenario can be found in Appendix F. <br /> <br />1 <br />1 2-16
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.