My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7850
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7850
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:47:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7850
Author
Hydrosphere Resource Consultants.
Title
Yampa River Basin Recommended Alternatives, Detailed Feasibility Study
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
Draft.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
t <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />IJ <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />Reservoir Operating Studies <br />8,000 of/yr associated with operation of a coal-gasification plant in the Craig area. Given these <br />data and assumptions, total annual basin depletions modeled under the 2015 and 2040 demand <br />conditions are roughly 128,000 of and 159,000 af, respectively. <br />Water Rights <br />The water rights of the various demands are represented in the model only in terms of <br />their priorities relative to each other and relative to the Juniper Project right. Generally <br />speaking, existing uses are considered senior to the Juniper rights while future uses, both 2015 <br />and 2040 level, are considered junior to the Juniper rights. There are two exceptions to this <br />general rule: 1) certain existing agricultural uses are modeled as having rights junior to the <br />Juniper project, and 2) the Hayden generating station has sufficient rights senior to the Juniper <br />Project to serve its projected long-term demand. <br />The model simulates the water rights and operations of three reservoirs, Stagecoach, <br />Steamboat Lake, and Elkhead. At each reservoir the model simulates the administrative <br />practices of the State Engineer. Storage water carried over on each reservoir's administration <br />(or "start-fill") date is charged against the next year's decreed fill amount. The carryover <br />water is charged against the senior-most decree first, then against the junior decrees. Although <br />specific reservoir accounts are maintained throughout the water year, water carried over is re- <br />allocated on the administration date among the various accounts according to specific account <br />priorities. Reservoir administration dates were modeled as the first day of the month following <br />the month having the lowest average simulated end-of-month storage. In all three cases the <br />reservoirs were modeled with an administration date of April 1st. <br />Three storage decrees were represented at Stagecoach Reservoir--the Stagecoach <br />Reservoir decree for 22,106 of per year, the Bear Reservoir decree for 11,614 of per year, and <br />the Four Counties decree which has an average annual limit of 4,595 af. The amount of the <br />Four Counties decree varies from year to year depending on the natural yields of the rights at <br />their original points of diversion on Fish and Walton Creeks in the upper Yampa River basin; <br />for purposes of the basin model, this variable amount was determined by following a method <br />described in a report prepared by W.W. Wheeler, Inc (1988). <br /> <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />u <br /> <br />Two storage decrees are represented at Steamboat Lake, the original decree for 23,064 <br />of and a new decree for 3,300 of applied for in 1993 by the Colorado Division of Wildlife <br />(CDOW). The new decree permits the CDOW to legally store water above the present <br />spillway crest at the lake; the supply so generated in the last few years has been leased under <br />temporary contracts to the USFWS for mainstem flow enhancement. <br />Three storage decrees were represented at Elkhead Reservoir in model scenarios <br />representing the enlargement of the reservoir--the decrees for 8,310 of and 5,000 of associated <br />with the existing reservoir and an additional decree reflecting the contemplated transfer of the <br />River District's California Park Reservoir conditional water right to the enlarged reservoir. <br />The California Park decrees include a first fill decree for 36,536 of having a 1972 priority and <br />a refill decree for 35,026 of having a 1981 priority. For modeling purposes, only the first fill <br />decree was assumed to be transferred to Elkhead. <br />Table 2-2 lists the relative priorities of water rights and demands explicitly represented in <br />various scenarios in the basin model. <br />2-5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.