Laserfiche WebLink
Inventory and Field Reconnaissance <br />SECOND FIELD RECONNAISSANCE <br /> A second round of field reconnaissance was carried out in August of 1994. This time <br /> period was chosen in the belief that it would permit a more thorough evaluation of the extent of <br /> instream construction activities associated with temporary structures and because it would <br /> permit observation of late-summer hydraulic conditions at the diversion structures. <br /> The reconnaissance began with an overflight of the river from Cross Mountain Canyon <br /> up to the vicinity of Mt. Harris. The objectives of this overflight were to obtain a more <br /> comprehensive view of the number and types of mainstem diversion structures, to identify any <br /> problematical structures that had been omitted from the previous inventories, and to obtain a <br /> more accurate description of structure locations. Notes and photographs were taken during the <br />' overflight and ditch location information was recorded directly onto a set of 7.5' maps of the <br /> reach. <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The overflight was followed up by three days of site visits to the individual structures <br />previously identified (in Table 2-2 above) as being problematical as well as several others that, <br />for reasons of proximity to previously identified structures or concerns raised during the aerial <br />reconnaissance, were deemed important to see first hand. As a result, between the two field <br />reconnaissance efforts, 15 diversion structures were examined first-hand. The structures <br />visited in the second field reconnaissance are listed in Table 2-3. <br />Table 2-3 <br />Structures Visited in Second Field Reconnaissance <br />Maybell Canal <br />K. Diamond/Patrick Sweeney Ditch <br />Craig Water Supply Pipeline <br />Deep Cut Irrigating Ditch <br />Cary Ditch Co. Ditch <br />Shelton Ditch <br />Williams Irrigation Ditch <br />Marshall Roberts Ditch <br />A checklist was used to organize the observations made at each of these sites. While not <br />all items on the checklist were relevant at each site, the list served as a reminder to record <br />whatever observations were possible pertaining to the following: <br />• location vis-a-vis critical/occupied habitat <br />• physical characteristics of the diversion structure <br />• apparent permanence of structure <br />• soils and geology at the site <br />• effects on upstream and downstream river morphology <br />• water surface elevations and flow velocities <br />• local ecological disturbance (instream and riparian) <br />• construction access and materials available <br />2-5