Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />rd <br /> <br /> <br />Reservoir Site Characterization <br />There are four USGS stream gages located on Elkhead Creek. Three of these gages are <br />located above the site of the existing reservoir: gage 9244500 (Elkhead Creek near Clark); <br />gage 9245000 (Elkhead Creek near Elkhead) and gage 9245500 (North Fork Elkhead Creek <br />near Elkhead). A fourth gage is located immediately above the confluence with the Yampa <br />River (gage 9246500). Inflow estimates at the reservoir site was developed using linear <br />regression on gages 9245000 and 9245500 which are both located above the reservoir. These <br />gage records were filled in and extended using regression equations developed against flows <br />recorded at the Maybell gage on the Yampa River. After the Elkhead Creek gages were <br />extended to cover the entire study period, the resulting flow records were adjusted to reflect <br />conditions at the site of the reservoir. The area-elevation-yield method was then used to <br />translate the extended gage data to the site of the reservoir. <br />Based on these data development procedures, the estimated annual inflow at the existing <br />Elkhead Reservoir ranged from 18,800 of (in 1977) to 99,100 of (in 1978); the average annual <br />inflow was estimated to be 64,500 af. The seasonal pattern and range of monthly inflows is <br />shown in Figure 3-4 which indicates that roughly 90%a of the annual inflow occurs in the <br />months of April, May, and June. Inflows in the fall and winter months are regularly less than <br />10 cfs. <br />Flood Hydrology <br />A concept for handling extreme hydrologic events at the enlarged Elkhead <br />Dam/Reservoir was presented in the Phase I Study. That concept consists of a primary outlet <br />sized to handle emergency reservoir drawdown, to deliver downstream flow demands, to carry <br />water to produce hydroelectric power and to pass frequent floods up to the mean annual peak <br />flood without the use of 'a service spillway. It is not functionally satisfactory or economically <br />feasible to provide a primary outlet which can handle more infrequently occurring flood flows. <br />A service spillway and an emergency spillway were therefore proposed to handle flows larger <br />than the mean annual peak flood. <br />The intent of this conceptual approach of flow handling is to provide a primary outlet <br />and a service spillway which together control releases from the reservoir for all hydrologic <br />events having a reasonable likelihood of occurrence during the 100-year design life of the <br />dam/reservoir. In addition, in order to meet State of Colorado and standard dam safety <br />criteria, the dam must be able to withstand, without failure by overtopping, a "safety evaluation <br />flood" (SEF). In this case the SEF is the statistically indeterminate PMF. An emergency <br />spillway, located in an adjacent topographic saddle, was therefore proposed to assist in the <br />conveyance of all flows exceeding the 100-year event. Since this emergency spillway directs <br />rare flood flows to an adjacent drainageway which in turn will carry the water back to Elkhead <br />Creek one mile downstream, and since the drainageway must otherwise continue to function as <br />it does now, the frequency and magnitude of water which it must handle under emergency <br />conditions must be minimized. Therefore, a three-foot surcharge pool has been provided <br />within the reservoir to function together with the service spillway (neglecting the primary <br />outlet) to handle most floods without using the emergency spillway. This combination of flow <br />capacity and hydrograph attenuation reduces the frequency of use of the emergency spillway to <br />approximately once in five hundred years (based on rainfall flood frequency) but maintains a <br />physical capability of handling extremely rare flows up to the PMF. <br />3-11