My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7886
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7886
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:43:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7886
Author
Hydrosphere Resource Consultants.
Title
Yampa River Basin Recommended Alternative, Detailed Feasibility Study
USFW Year
1995.
USFW - Doc Type
Final Report.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
299
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Reservoir Site Characterization <br /> <br />In addition to this mapping, a comprehensive effort to identify and collect all available , <br />site area mapping was conducted. Most of this information proved to be of marginal value <br />because it was either outdated, insufficient in coverage,'or limited in accuracy. All the sources <br />which were identified are tabulated in the annotated bibliography. This other mapping was <br />utilized in two important ways. First, the USGS mapping of Routt County and Moffat County <br />from 1975 and the USGS 15' quadrangle maps of 1971 and 1973 provided the drainage basin <br />maps for the hydrologic evaluation. Second, all of the maps which covered at least some of the <br />dam site and downstream area were used in the downstream fluviomorphologic analysis. The <br />maps were modified to a common scale basis with common physical landmarks used as overlay <br />register points. The temporal changes in the Elkhead Creek channel plan location could be <br />examined in this manner and quantitative conclusions reached about channel movement. <br />Unfortunately, only limited quantitative horizontal dimensions could be made in this manner <br />and vertical elevations with an accuracy of greater than 2' are not available to make precise <br />degradation conclusions. <br />OPERATIONAL AND FLOOD HYDROLOGY <br />Background <br />Research of available documentation reveals essentially no pre-construction information <br />on either operational hydrology (how the dam/reservoir was expected to regulate seasonal <br />inflows during its lifetime) or extreme event hydrology (rare, short duration, high instantaneous <br />peak flows associated with distinct meteorologic events). Operational hydrology is used to <br />determine the water storage capacity necessary to meet, in this case, raw water supply <br />demands; such operational modeling is described in another section of this report. Rare event <br />hydrology is used to size the components of the project which are needed to prevent the <br />overtopping failure of the dam, thereby providing protection of the infrastructure investment in <br />the dam and providing public safety. This rare event or flood hydrology is the subject of this <br />section of the report. Fortunately, since the construction of the existing dam, several Probable <br />Maximum Flood (PMF) evaluations have been completed. These provide a basis for the <br />generation of the remaining rare event hydrologic information needed for the present study. <br />Operational Hydrology I <br />In order to carry out the operational studies of existing and proposed reservoirs in the <br />Phase I Study, monthly inflow data sets were developed for numerous points in the basin using <br />a regional analysis approach. This analysis was based on records from USGS streamflow <br />gages and on estimates from previous studies of water yields (e.g., M-K, 1987; Tipton and <br />Kalmbach, 1980). This approach utilized existing stream flow data to derive physical water <br />yield models (regression equations) which accepted tributary area, average elevation, and <br />aspect as independent variables. These regression models predicted annual stream flows which <br />were then disaggregated into monthly flows based on distribution patterns observed over the <br />gaged periods. Inflow files comprising monthly values for the entire 1930 to 1982 study period <br />were developed. The veracity of regional models was tested by applying them to selected sub- <br />basins for which a substantial period of record of gaged flows were recorded. Favorable <br />comparisons between predicted and recorded flows for these sub-basins validated this approach. <br />3-10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.