Laserfiche WebLink
J <br />,. <br />Table 3.--Estimated loss (or gain) of riparian cover types <br />attributable to categories o change over time. <br /> Rip arian Cover Tv pes <br />Categories of change Deciduous Scrub <br />fQr each time period Woodland Scrub Herbaceou,~ Totals <br /> acres/year <br />Loss to development <br /> 1938 through 195fi 106 248 2123 2477 <br /> .1956 through 1974 167 234 904 1305 <br /> 1974 through 1982 455 218 1519 2192 <br />Loss to the River <br /> 1938 through 1956 52 109 237 398 <br /> 196fi through 1974 26 40 28 94 <br /> 1974 through 1982 96 159 118 373 <br />Loss (gain) to other causes <br /> 1938 through 1966 ( 688) ( 9Z) 388 ( 392) <br /> 1966 through 1974 <br />1974 t~(,8~ah 1982 ( 673) <br />X185 140 <br />( 381 ( 612) <br />( 28161 (1145) <br />(1669 ) <br />way. Since fsr more acres were converted to agri- <br />culture than all other developed types combined, <br />the "lose to development" ce~tegory, can be for the <br />most part, be thought of am a "loss to agricul- <br />ture" trtegory. <br />"Lone to development" accounted for a large <br />percentage (49 percent.) of the total riparian <br />losses during the entire period studied. Some of <br />each riparian type was developed during every <br />period, but substantially more of the herbaceous <br />type was lost to development then any other type. <br />Development accounted for 65, 64, and 79 percent <br />(chronologically) of all herbaceous losses. The <br />rate at which each riparian type was lost to <br />development changed over time. The rate of loss <br />declined for both the herbaceous and shrub-scrub <br />types, while it increased for tht forest type. It <br />appears that ss the amount of herbaceous and shrub <br />area declined, more emphasis may have been placed <br />on converting woodlands to agriculture. <br />"Loss to the river" included the loss of <br />riparian cover from-the shores of islands as well <br />as the mainland, due to bank erosion by water. It <br />also included loss of riparian cover from an area <br />downstream from Fort Peck psm, where earth was <br />removed and used to construct the Dam. Since then <br />this excavated area has filled with water. Floods <br />occurred during the study period that influenced <br />the, amount of riparian cover lost to the river. A <br />total of 12,238 acres of riparian cover was lost <br />to the river during the study period. This type <br />of loss accounted for only seven percent of the <br />total riparian losses during the entire period. <br />Less of each cover type was-lost to the river than <br />was lost to any other category during the same <br />period. <br />"Loss (or gain) to other causes" accounted <br />for all other effects of reduction and growth of <br />riparian vegetation caused by humans and nature <br />that resulted in the conversion of one type into <br />another. Again occurred whenever developed land <br />reverted to riparian cover (28,932 acres in <br />total), and when new riparian growth occurred on <br />soil deposited by the river (not specifically <br />calculated). The rate of change was quite <br />volatile with each cover- type undergoing periods <br />of loss and gain. Only three periods of loss <br />occurred and they were staggered, one in each time <br />period. The increase in forest loss attributable <br />to this category was acute between 1974 and 1982, <br />when a rate of gain of 673 acres per year dropped <br />to a loss of 1186 acres per year. <br />CONCLUSIONS <br />There is much concern over the loss of ripar- <br />ian habitat, especially in the western United <br />State, because of the importance of this habitat <br />to fish and wildlife resources. Although studies <br />conducted elsewhere have documented the loss of <br />this habitat, information was not available on the <br />status of riparian habitat on the Missouri River <br />in Montana. This fact plus the observations of <br />numerous biologists that rather large blocks (20 <br />to 80 acres) of trees were being cleared in the <br />mid-to-late 1970's along the reach of Missouri <br />River reported upon here, with unknown habitat <br />consequences, led to this study. <br />A cursory examination of data in Table 2 may <br />lead one to believe, at least 1n the case of <br />forests, that there is not much reason for concern <br />about loss of this type in the study reach. There <br />was attually more of-the forest type in 1982 <br />(23,189 acres) than there was in 1938 (18,374 <br />acres). However, closer examination shows that <br />there was an increase of forests from 1936 through <br />1974, followed by a substantial loss between 1974 <br />:and 1982. The data reflect a gain of (}~ percent <br />in this type in the 36-year interval between 1938 <br />`and 1974, followed by a 37 percent loss in dust <br />-eight years between 1974 and 1982. Further confir- <br />mation of this reversal is shown in Table 3. The <br />annual rate of "gain due to other causes" of the <br />woodland type declined Prom about 680 acres per <br />year between 1938 and 1974 to a loss of 1185 acres <br />par year between 1974 and 1982. If the rate of <br />loss observed between 1974 and 1982 continues into <br />the future, there is valid reason to be concerned <br />about the longevity of the cottonwood forests in <br />thts reach of river. <br />