My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8036
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8036
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:41:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8036
Author
Haynes, C. M., R. T. Muth and G. T. Skiba.
Title
Identification of Habitat Requirements and Limiting Factors for Colorado Squawfish and Humpback Chubs (July 1 1982 to June 30 1983).
USFW Year
1983.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PVC collection buckets (10-cm diameter). Each net had a 560 u mesh, a <br />length of 4 m and an open-mesh to net mouth ratio of 11:1. This design <br />enhances self-cleaning and filtration efficiency of the net theoretically <br />approaches 100% (Faber 1968, Tranter and Smith 1968). Attached to each net <br />frame was a removable 4-point, steel cable bridle assembly terminating in <br />a spring-loaded carabiner. Nets were deployed either by staking the net <br />frames to the substrate or by fastening the bridle carabiner to a <br />polypropylene line fixed to either an instream boulder or a metal post <br />driven into the shore. <br />Drift-net (ichthyoplankton) sampling in the Colorado River study area was <br />conducted in the Black Rocks area (km 219.8 to 218.2) at dawn, dusk, and <br />midnight using 3 nets during each collection period. Sampling duration <br />ranged from 30 minutes to 1 hour/set depending upon accumulation of sand <br />and organic debris in the collection buckets. A Marsh-McBirney flowmeter <br />(Model 201) was used to measure water volume filtered by each net. An <br />attempt to attach nets to a cable stretched the full width of the river <br />was abandoned for safety reasons. In the Yampa River study area, <br />only 1 net was used/site due to restricted storage space in the inflatable <br />raft used to travel within the area. Drift sampling was conducted <br />in conjunction with regularly-scheduled random sampling and sampling times <br />per date varied; however, approximately equal numbers of nocturnal and <br />diurnal collections were taken over the period. Sampling duration varied <br />from 30 minutes to 7 hours depending upon the amount of organic debris <br />and sand accumulation. Water volume filtered by the net was measured <br />with a pygmy flowmeter (Gurley Model 625 F). <br />Samples were preserved in 10% formalin and returned to the laboratory for <br />sorting and analysis. Specimens were stored in 3% buffered formalin. <br />Specimens were identified to the lowest feasible taxon, counted, and <br />measured to the nearest 0.1-mm total length (TL). Since reliable criteria <br />for the differentiation of YOY and juvenile chubs (including hybrids <br />and/or intergrades) are not yet available, all ch~~bs were listed as Gila <br />spp. Drift rates were computed as number/1,000 m3. A nonparametric <br />permutation technique (Mielke and Iyer 1982) was performed on Colorado <br />River data to compare drift densities (response variable), collectively, and <br />for predominant taxa, among the 3 sampling times (treatments) over the <br />entire sampling period. Lack of replication and sampling time variability <br />did not permit a similar analysis of Yampa River drift data. <br />RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br />A total of 694 individual collections (seine and drift net) was made <br />in both study areas combined (Table 1). In the Colorado River, 384 <br />samples were collected between 5 March and 27 August, 1982. In the Yampa <br />River, 310 samples were collected between 18 April and 23 October, 1982. <br />Due to a rafting accident, 46 Yampa samples collected on 8-11 June, were <br />lost. Preliminary sorting and analysis of 1982 samples are complete. Data <br />have been stored on the Fish and Wildlife Service MANAGE database program <br />at Colorado State University, Fort Collins. The current status of MANAGE <br />data files from 17 March, 1981 to present are shown in Table 2. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.