Laserfiche WebLink
In itself, the above list demonstrates the-need for a <br />State program under a carefully thought-out law, as opposed to <br />authorization of private instream flow appropriations. How the <br />courts could adequately deal with allocation of instream <br />quantities of water for recreational purposes without some means <br />of capture, possession and control being effectuated, and how <br />Colorado could (1) make maximum utilization of its water <br />resources and (2) protect its compact and equitable apportionment <br />share of water, while at the same time allowing appropriation of <br />private instream flow water rights, is unclear and so fraught <br />with public policy considerations, as to make this consideration <br />quintessentially a legislative question. <br />Hopefully, a wide variety of Coloradans will lend their <br />support to enactment of a Statewide recreational waters program <br />as an alternative, on the one hand, to ignoring the public <br />interest in having an adequate supply of water for recreational <br />needs and, on the other hand, abandoning the prior appropriation <br />doctrine as Colorado's water allocation mechanism. <br />VI. WATER FOR WETLANDS. <br />It is evident from reading the CWCB, State Parks, and <br />Wildlife Commission statutes that these State agencies have <br />adequate authority between and among themselves to carry out a <br />water for wetlands program through a combination of <br />appropriations to preserve the environment to a reasonable degree <br />and purchase, lease, or change of water rights for this purpose. <br />Moreover, there is an extensive federal regulatory program under <br />section 404 of the Clean Water Act which protects wetlands from <br />-28- <br />