Laserfiche WebLink
~.. <br />3 ,, <br />tank. A regular screen was covered with saran material to retain the fry in <br />the tank. A 3 to 6 gpm flow of 62±1oF ti~ell water was maintained through the <br />test. A trout starter diet was offered at least four times daily. Food was <br />administered with ajar with holes in the lid to alleviate excessive over- <br />~ feeding. All the water surface of the tank was covered with feed at each <br />feeding. The tank was cleaned in the same manner as in the first test. <br />The fish were moved to a rearing pond after 17 days on feed. The rear- <br />ing pond had developed a zooplankton bloom that would support the fry at the <br />time of stocking. <br />RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br />Pond Spawning <br />The temperature of the two ponds that received brood razorback suckers <br />ranged from 44 to 61 for the first 68 days that the fish were stocked. The <br />temperatures were in-the 50's for all but about eight days during the early <br />part of this period. <br />Spawning activity was noted the 12th day after the fish were stocked <br />in the pond. There were three sweat areas in CS and five areas in pond C6. <br />The areas that were cleaned were from 2 to 3 feet in diameter. Fish were <br />._ ---- <br />observed over these and other cleaned areas on several occasions. Obser- <br />vations from a boat with an underwater viewer confirmed that nest areas <br />were being prepared. On three occasions eggs were observed on the rocks in <br />the two ponds. The difficulty of see in g the almost transparent eggs made <br />i <br />any estimation of numbers impossible. Another observation of a few fungused <br />eggs adhered to racks in pond C6 gave evidence that spawning had taken place <br />at least a total of four occasions in the two ponds. <br />The ponds developed a phytoplankton Uloom that limited clear observa- <br />tions for the last 30 days of the spawning period. It appeared that rock <br />5 <br />