My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7143
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7143
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:01:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7143
Author
Inskip, P. D.
Title
Habitat Suitability Index Models
USFW Year
1982.
USFW - Doc Type
Northern Pike.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Temperatures at which development is most rapid are also associated with j <br />reduced embryonic and larval survival. Mortality of eggs is high at incubation <br />temperatures greater than 16° C (Swift 1965). Larvae from eggs exposed to <br />temperatures greater than 18° C early in development appear unhealthy <br />(Lillelund 1966). Lillelund (1966) reported maximum hatching success for <br />incubation temperatures between 9 and 15° C and noted that the tolerance of <br />embryos to temperatures outside of this range increases quickly after fertili- <br />zation. Hokanson et a1. (1973) gave an optimal range for incubation of 6.4 to <br />17.7° C. Most eggs die when temperatures drop to, or remain near, 5° C, but <br />embryos can tolerate dies temperature fluctuations of up to 4° C provided the <br />temperature stays in the suitable range (Hassler 1970). <br />~. The habitat of the embryos becomes the initial habitat of the fry <br />(Franklin and Smith 1963). Dense vegetative cover provides several advantages <br />to larval northern pike (Frost and Kipling 1967). Yolk sac fry have small <br />papillae on the front of their heads with which they can attach to vegetation <br />and remain suspended above the sediments. This keeps the fry removed from <br />dangerously low levels of oxygen, and high levels of H2S, on the bottom. <br />Hydrogen sulfide concentrations greater than 0.004 to 0.006 ppm (96-hour <br />exposure) decrease growth and survival of sac fry (Adelman and Smith 1970a). <br />Once the yolk sac is absorbed and the fry are ready to feed, approximately <br />10 days after hatching in Minnesota (Franklin and Smith 1963), the invertebrate <br />fauna associated with the vegetation provides a suitable food base. Thick <br />vegetation also provides refuge from potential predators. Young northern pike <br />are vulnerable to predation from a variety of fishes, including other northern <br />pike (Hunt and Carbine 1951; Al t 1968) . <br />.Immediately after hatching, fry are very active (Frost and Kipling 1967; <br />Howard and Thomas 1970). Within the first day, however, most attach to vegeta- <br />tion, where they remain for several days while the yolk sac is being absorbed <br />(Frost and Kipling 1967). In hatchery jars, with no vegetation, fry became <br />quiescent after the initial burst of activity and sank to the bottom (Howard <br />and Thomas 1970). <br />Fry average 7 to 9 mm in length at hatching (Frost and Kipling 1967; <br />Forney 1968). They begin to emigrate from spawning sloughs when 15 to 20 mm <br />long (Carbine 1942; Franklin and Smith 1963; Forney 1968). The time required <br />to grow to this size is variable. Emigration began 10 to 13 days after hatch- <br />ing in New York (Forney 1968) and 16 to 24 days after hatching in Minnesota <br />(Franklin and Smith 1963). <br />Emigration may be concentrated or prolonged. Forney (1968) reported that <br />82, 99, and 37% of the fry left a controlled marsh within 20 days after emigra- <br />tion started, in 3 successive. years. Data of Franklin and Smith (1963) indi- <br />cate similar variability in the length of time for emigration. Most young-of- <br />the-year pike emigrated from a Saskatchewan marsh within a 1-week period, <br />6 weeks after the completion of spawning (Koshinsky 1979). The reasons for <br />this variability are unclear. Emigration is inhibited by low light intensity; <br />prolonged periods of overcast weather might extend the emigration period <br />(Franklin and Smith 1963; Forney 1968). Other factors, such as water level <br />and food supply, may also determine when the fry depart (Royer 1971). <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.