Laserfiche WebLink
It is also suspected that increased c.lari y of the Missouri River has affected <br />food availability by changing species`compostion and by making it more <br />difficult for pallid sturgeon, and other native species, to capture prey in <br />the clearer water environment. In the Missouri River, pelagic planktivores <br />and sight-feeding carnivores have increased in abundance, whereas species <br />specialized. for life in the turbid, predevelopment river; (like the pallid ` <br />sturgeon) have decreased in abundance (Pflieger and Grace 11.987): .This change <br />in community structure is less apparent where changes in the natural., <br />hydrograph, temperature regime, and turbidity are less pronounced. <br />Flood flows were essential for the dynamic transport. of sediment and the re- <br />arrangement of these sediments -into natural morphological channel features <br />(fish habitat); it served to introduce and transport organic matter from the <br />floodplain; and to maintain turbidity. Flood flows were the principle method <br />for the introduction of large woody debris-and carried nutrients to floodplain <br />plant communities, which determined floodplain forest composition and <br />structure. .Invertebrate reproduction and behavioral migration was closely <br />tied to the natural hydrograph (Hesse and Mestl 1993c).;- <br />Nearly all snags were remaved•from the Missouri R-fiver between 1.838 and 1950., <br />This, plus the cessation of flooding and meandering as a result of damming and <br />channelizing the river. has reduced-the availability of organic matter upplies <br />utili-zed by the aquatic invertebrate community (Hesse and Mestl 1993a). Snags <br />influence sediment routing, thus creating pools, gravel bars, and depositional <br />areas, which in turn reduce-the. rate of downstream transport of particulate <br />organic matter (Bilby and Ward 1991; 8ilby and Likens 1980).. <br />Snags also provide habitat for aquatic insects that make up a large proportion <br />of .both the shovelnose and:pall:id sturgeon's diet.; These insects.are- <br />collector-filterer-gatherers (Merritt and Cummins 1984). They-cling to large <br />woody debris in high velocity areas, gathering drifting diatoms, algae, <br />:animals, and organic detritus. Mestl and Hesse (1993) ddcumented a decline <br />in the abundance of snag insect production of more than 65 percent in <br />Nebraska's portion of the Missouri River between 1963 and <1980.- <br />In spite of man's efforts to constrict and control the Missouri :and . <br />Mississippi Rivers with reservoirs, stabilized banks, betties, dikes, levees <br />and reventments-that result in impacts described above, remnant reaches of the <br />Missouri River and the Mississippi River from the Missouri River confluence to <br />the-Gulf still provide habitat.. believed usable by pallid sturgeon. These. <br />remnants described later as Recovery-Priority Management Ares are priority <br />areas for implementation of recovery actions. <br />Commercial Harvest: Historically, pallid, shovelnose, and lake sturgeon were <br />commercially harvested on the Missouri-and Mississippi Rivers (Helms 1974). <br />The .larger-lake and pailid sturgeon were sought for their eggs which were sold <br />as caviar, whereas shovelnose sturgeon were destroyed as a bycatch. <br />Commercia] harvest of all sturgeon has declined substantially since record <br />keeping-began in the late 1800's. Most commercial-catch records for sturgeon <br />have not differentiated between species. Combined harvests-as'high as <br />195,450 kg (430,889 lbs) were recorded in the Mississippi River in the early <br />1890's, but had declined to less than 9,100 kg (20,062 lbs) by 1950 (Carlander <br />13 <br />