Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />t <br />a <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />As indicated in the 1988 guiding document for the Recovery Implementation Program <br />(RIP) for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin, reoperation of <br />major impoundments of the Colorado River Storage Project far protection and recovery <br />of endangered fishes is a high priority; reoperation is necessary to offset- depletion <br />impacts contributing to endangerment of humpback chub (Gila cypha), bonytail {G. <br />elegans), Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus luclus), and razorback sucker (Xyrauchen <br />texanus). Flaming Gorge Dam (FGD) on the Green River, Wayne Aspinal Unit on the <br />Gunnison River, and Ruedi Dam on the Colorado River were specifically identified in the <br />RIP guiding document as those impoundments that, through Section 7 consultation, <br />were to offset depletion impacts to the maximum extent- possible. Additionally, these <br />impoundments, where possible, were to provide recovery flows for endangered fishes <br />in major rivers (Green and Colorado rivers) and tributaries of the Upper Colorado River <br />System. <br />Closure of FGD in 1962 caused significant alterations in magnitude and timing of Green <br />River flows, resu{ting in modification of fish habitat in the system. In 1980, the U.S. <br />Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) entered into Section 7 consultation with the U.S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on the operation of FGD. Studies conducted from <br />1978-1991 culminated in preparation of a Biological Opinion by the Service on <br />operation of FGD for Reclamation and the Western Area Power Administration (VIIAPA). <br />Central to the issuance of the November 1992 Biological Opinion was development of <br />seasonal flow recommendations for operation of FGD based on best available <br />information and the professional judgement of researchers who had collected and <br />analyzed much of the data. The intent of the Biological Opinion was to recommend <br />flows that would restore the natural hydrograph to the maximum extent possible and <br />provide a flow regime that would allow for enhancement and recovery of endangered <br />and other native fishes from the Green-Yampa River confluence to Lake Powell. <br />However, because of data limitations, the Biological Opinion provided only partial <br />recommendations by season for the reach of the Green River from FGD to Jensen, <br />Utah. Flow recommendations for the spring, summer/fall, and winter periods were made <br />using information presented in the Consolidated Biology and Hydrology Report prepared <br />by the Service; specific flow recommendations are presented in part 2.0 of document <br />Section 2. <br />The Biological Opinion concluded that "historic" procedures (prior to 1992) for operation <br />of FGD jeopardized the continued existence of endangered fishes in the Green River. <br />A Reasonable and Prudent Alternative was provided to avoid jeopardy, and it is <br />incumbent upon Reclamation, WAPA, and the R1P to ensure that all elements of the <br />Biological Opinion are met. The Five Year Flaming Gorge Research Program described <br />in part 3.0 of document Section 2 is designed to fulfill the requirements and intent of the <br />Reasonable and Prudent Alternative which included the following elements. <br />1. Change operation of FGD so that Green River flow and temperature regimes <br />would more closely resemble historic natural conditions. Under this element, <br />seasonal flow recommendations were established in an attempt to enhance the status <br />of endangered and other native fishes in the Green River system downstream of FGD. <br />Flow recommendations for spring, summer/fall, and winter periods were based on <br />information presented in the Consolidated Biology and Hydrology Report. <br />2 <br /> <br />