|
<br />LIST OF TABLES
<br />
<br />Table
<br />1. Constituent elements for razorback sucker ......, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
<br />2. Constituent elements by proposed critical habitat. reach for Colorado squawfish,
<br />humpback chub, and bony tail ,.....................,..,.,.,......,
<br />3. Critical habitat for four endangered Colorado River fishes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
<br />4. Ownership of shoreline (in miles) for proposed critical habitat for the endangered
<br />Colorado River fishes , . . , . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 5
<br />5. Industrial Sectors used in Economic Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; . . . . . . . . . . . .. 23
<br />6. Activity and Percentage of Costs Attributable to Critical Habitat in the Upper Basin
<br />with Recovery in the Year 2003. . . . . . . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . .. 27
<br />7, The Percentage of Costs Attributable to Critical Habitat in the Lower Basin if
<br />Substantial Recovery Has Occurred by 2003. .,........,......,..,..... 28
<br />8. Direct Economic Impacts . . , . . , . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . . . . . . . . , .. 29
<br />9. Present Value (3%) of Incremental Output Impacts for Proposed Critical Habitat
<br />Designation for 20 Economic Sectors by State and for the Colorado River
<br />
<br />Basin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . . . ., . , . . . . . . . . . .. 31
<br />
<br />10. Present Value (3%) of Incremental Earnings Impacts for Proposed Critical Habitat
<br />Designation for 20 Economic Sectors by State and for the Colorado River
<br />
<br />Basin . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . .' . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , . . . . . . .. 33
<br />
<br />11. Present Value (3%) of Incremental Indirect Business and Personal Taxes Impacts
<br />for Proposed Critical Habitat Designation for 20 Economic Sectors by State
<br />and for the Colorado River Basin .....................,.........,.. 34
<br />12. State Employment- Incremental Impacts Over Time of Critical Habitat
<br />
<br />Designation. . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. , . . . . . . . . .. 35
<br />
<br />13. State- and Regional-Level Present Value and Annualized Incremental Critical
<br />Habitat Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . .. 36
<br />14. Colorado River Basin: National Efficiency Results (CGE) .................,. 39
<br />15, Colorado River Basin - National Economic Impacts: Levels and Differences ,.... 40
<br />16. National Efficiency (CGE): Present and Annualized Values ..............,.. 41
<br />17. National Efficiency (CGE): Present and Annualized Values ................. 41
<br />18. Possible outcomes of a Section 7 Consultation ............."............ 48
<br />19. Examples of possible reasonable and prudent alternatives. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 49
<br />20. . Sources of comments received .................".................,. 58
<br />21. Position of commentors and type of response to the proposed critical habitat
<br />
<br />designation ...,...,................,............,........... 59E
<br />Page
<br />3
<br />
<br />4
<br />5
<br />
<br />IV
<br />
|