Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Employment <br /> <br />Approximately 3.5 million people are employed in the Basin economy. The largest single <br />employment sector is the public sector (includes all levels of government), which accounts for <br />16.9 percent of total employment. The combined manufacturing sector is only slightly behind <br />the public sector, with 15.4 percent of total employment within the Colorado River Basin <br />States. The recreation services sector is also a very significant part of total employment at <br />10.5 percent. The electric power production sector is around 0.5 percent of the total <br />employment. Combined agricultural employment is approximately 4.3 percent of total <br />employment (the livestock feed sector is 0.19 percent of employment, and the other crops <br />sector is approximately 0.17 percent of employment). The petroleum and gas production <br />sector accounts for about 0.2 percent of total employment. <br /> <br />Historical Development of the Basin <br /> <br />The rapid urbanization of the Basin has had a significant effect on the endangered fishes. <br />This is reflected in the fraction of the population living in urban areas in 1990 as compared <br />with this fraction in 1950. With the exception of California, this fraction was in the 50-65 <br />percent range in 1950 and is now in the 65-90 percent range. The major consequence has <br />been a significant increase in the use of water and electric power. <br /> <br />MODELING OVERVIEW <br /> <br />Two types of economic effects are of interest when considering the economic impacts of <br />critical habitat designations: regional economic impacts and national economic efficiency <br />impacts. Regional economic impacts refer to the impact of the proposed critical habitat <br />designations on specific geographic regions, such as States or other sub-regions of the <br />country. Frequently, regional economic impacts effect a transfer of resources from one region <br />to another. For example, if one State in the Basin increases its consumptive use of Colorado <br />River water, another State may have to forego some of its use of Colorado River water. <br />Thus, a positive regional impact to one State can be a negative impact to another, and vice <br />versa. <br /> <br />Regional economic impacts in this study were analyzed using input-output models which <br />organize the basic accounting relationships that describe the production sector of the <br />economy. The input-output method starts with the assumption that all sectors of the economy <br />are tied together by virtue of economic relations called linkages, and the production of a good <br />or service can be described by a recipe whose ingredients are the outputs of the other sectors <br />of the economy. The primary inputs are labor, capital, and other raw resources. Through its <br />multiplier analysis, the input-output model is capable of generating estimates of the changes <br />in output for sectors, changes in employment, and changes in income due to species listing <br />and proposed critical habitat designation. The models report the total impacts that result from <br />the interactions among the sectors of the economy. <br /> <br />20 <br />