Laserfiche WebLink
<br />remnant stocks may lose genetic diversity. Ultimately, extinction could result because the <br />loss of genetic diversity may make populations more susceptible to environmental change. <br /> <br />The historical ranges of the four endangered species have been fragmented by construction of <br />dams and water diversions throughout the Basin (Carlson and Muth 1989). The Service <br />believ~s that it is important to the survival and recovery of these species to reestablish <br />populations in several geographically distinct areas within their former range. Providing <br />geographically distinct areas that contain varying thermal, chemical, geological, and physical <br />parameters will encourage maintenance of the current genetic pool. These parameters <br />influence important life history characteristics such as time of spawning, recruitment, growth, <br />mortality rates, and longevity. <br /> <br />HABITATS AND STATUS OF ENDANGERED FISHES <br /> <br />General--The four endangered Colorado River fishes evolved in the Colorado River and were <br />adapted to the natural environment that existed prior to the beginning of large-scale water <br />development. Thus, they were adapted to a system of fluctuating seasonal and annual flows <br />influenced by wet, average, and dry climatic periods. Recent population declines and <br />disappearances of endemic fish species in much of their former range have been associated <br />with relatively rapid and widespread anthropogenic changes. These changes have altered the <br />physical and biological characteristics of many mainstream rivers in the Basin and occurred <br />so rapidly that the fishes have not had time to adapt to them (Carlson and Muth 1989). Dams <br />and diversions have fragmented former fish habitat by restricting fish movement. As a result, <br />genetic interchange (emigration and immigration of individuals) between some fish <br />populations is no longer possible. Large floods were once normal in the Basin and provided <br />food and nutrient exchange between river channels and shallow-water floodplain habitats. <br />These floods are now controlled by numerous dams. As a result of these dams, major <br />changes also have occurred in water quality, quantity, temperature, sediment and nutrient <br />transport, and other characteristics of the aquatic environment (Carlson and Muth 1989). The <br />altered habitats that have resulted are now more suitable for introduced, nonnative fishes, <br />some of which have flourished (Minckley et al, 1982; Tyus et al. 1982; Carlson and Muth <br />1989). These changes have greatly altered the river environment and no unaltered habitat <br />remains in the Basin for the four Colorado River endangered fish species. <br /> <br />Razorback Sucker-- This species was abundant and widely distributed in mainstream rivers of <br />the Colorado River (Jordan and Evermann 1896; Minckley 1973). A relatively large stock of <br />. razorback suckers remain in Lake Mohave (Minckley et al. 1991). However, the formerly <br />large Lower Basin populations have been virtually extirpated from all natural riverine <br />environments, and recruitment is virtually nonexistent in the remnant stocks (Minckley et al. <br />1991). In the Upper Basin, the fish persists in the lower Yampa and Green rivers, <br />mainstream Colorado River, and lower San Juan River (Tyus et al. 1982; Minckley et al. <br />1991; Platania et al. 1991), but there is little indication of recruitment in these remnant stocks. <br />The largest extant riverine population occurs in the upper Green River Basin, but it consists <br /> <br />13 <br />