Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PART 11- Biological Overview <br /> <br />This biological overview provides a brief summary of the life histories and habitat <br />requirements for each species, It provides a synopsis of the Service's Biological Support <br />Document and readers may wish to refer to that document for detailed information on the <br />biological aspects of the critical habitat designation. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />The four endangered fishes are endemic to the Colorado River Basin (Basin), which consists <br />of portions of seven Western States. The Basin drains approximately 242,000 sq. miles <br />within the United States and has been politically divided into an Upper and Lower Basin. <br />The Upper Basin consists of portions of the States of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and <br />Wyoming. The Lower Basin consists of portions of the States of Arizona, California, and <br />Nevada. An additional 2,000 sq. miles of the Basin lies within Mexico. <br /> <br />Historically, the native fish fauna of the mainstream Colorado River was dominated by <br />minnows (cyprinids) and suckers (catostomids; Minckley et al. 1986). However, four of <br />these, the razorback sucker, Colorado squawfish, humpback chub, and bony tail, are now listed <br />as endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. These fishes are <br />threatened with extinction due to the combined effects of habitat loss (including regulation of <br />natural flow and changes to temperature and sediment regimes); proliferation of introduced <br />fishes; and other man-induced disturbances (Miller 1961; Minckley 1973; USFWS 1987; <br />Carlson and Muth 1989). <br /> <br />Colorado squawfish populations survive only in the Upper Basin, where their numbers are <br />relatively high only in the Green River basin of Utah and Colorado when compared with <br />other rivers in the Basin (Tyus 1991). Razorback sucker and bony tail populations throughout <br />the Basin consist predominately of old adult fish, and they persist only because of the <br />longevity inherent in these species (USFWS 1990a; Minckley et al. 1991). Humpback chub <br />populations in the Little Colorado River, Black Rocks, and Westwater in the Colorado River <br />appear relatively stable in number of fish, but declines have been apparent in other locations <br />(USFWS 1990b). <br /> <br />Conservation of these four species will require the identification and management of water <br />resources and habitat areas that are considered important to any fish species, such as <br />spawning areas and nursery grounds. However, because the four endangered fishes are <br />present in such low numbers, basic life history and habitat use information has been difficult <br />to obtain. Some areas used by Colorado squawfish and razorback sucker for spawning have <br />been located by radiotracking, tagging, and collection of eggs or larvae (Tyus and Karp 1990; <br />Tyus 1990). Spawning information is less available in other places where these species are <br />more rare. Actions that have resulted in a lack of reproduction andlor recruitment have been <br />hypothesized as factors in their endangerment (USFWS 1990a, 1990b, 1991). In this case, <br />not only would a lack of successful recruitment lead to small numbers of fish, but over time, <br /> <br />12 <br />