Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />-based Sharing Procedure for Tribal Lands (3% Discount Rate) <br />DEVIATIONS over Baseline (Tribal Lands) <br />Output Million 1990$ Percent <br />NPV 3 percent -10.206 -0.079 <br /> <br />Annualized values -0.516 -0.113 <br /> <br />Employment Persons Percent <br />Average Annual Incremental <br />Jobs Foregone <br />9 <br />-0.089 <br />t Table 6-D-3 Present Value and Annualized Incremental Critical Habitat Impacts <br />Using the Population-based Sharine Procedure for Tribal Lands (30% Dkenunt Rate) <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />DEVIATIONS over Baseline (Tribal Lands) <br />Output Million 1990$ Percent <br />NPV 3 percent -18.498 -0.079 <br /> <br />Annualized values -0.935 -0.113 <br /> <br />Employment Persons Percent <br />Average Annual Incremental <br />Jobs Foregone <br />16 <br />-0.089 <br />I E. Discussion of Results <br />The results suggest that the overall impacts to the regional economy will be relatively small. <br />Individual sectors, such as construction, will experience larger impacts, but the total impact is <br />' less than 1 percent of the total output of the tribal economies over the study period. The sharing <br />of the tribal impacts produced a lower bound on impacts when sharing was based on <br />employment, and an upper bound on impacts when sharing was based on population. <br />1 <br /> <br />Table 6-D-2 Present Value and Annualized Incremental Critical Habitat Impacts <br />Using the Employment <br />54 <br />1