My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9387
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9387
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:37:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9387
Author
Brookshire, D. S., M. McKee and S. Stewart.
Title
A Four Corners Regional Focus on the Economic Impact of Critical Habitat Designation for teh Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squawfish, and Bonytail.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
Albuquerque.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />1 <br />quantity of output is reduced in the agricultural sector due to restrictions on the supply of a key <br />' input. For this reason, a mixed modeling approach was used in which the agricultural impacts <br />are generated through a supply-side shock that generates an exogenous change in the level of <br />output in the agriculture sector. The direct impacts in the remaining sectors are modeled as the <br />more typical final demand changes.10 <br />The "with fish" scenario includes four sets of direct impacts: <br />' 1. Construction of Water Delivery Projects - In the baseline projection for the 10-county <br />region several water delivery projects are constructed and water is delivered (NIIP, ALP, <br />SJ-C). Supplying instream water for the fishes may require that some of these projects be <br />foregone and some modified. The consequence is that the volume of water available for <br />agricultural uses will be reduced, and the level of activity in the construction sectors will <br />decline. <br />2. Electric Power Impacts - Providing flows for the endangered fishes has implications <br />' for the production of electric power at the Navajo Dam. Power production will decline <br />during the peak period, and the city of Farmington will be have to purchase power from <br />the grid at a higher cost. <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />3. Agriculture Impacts - Water will not be available for use in irrigation since some of <br />the projected water delivery projects will be canceled or modified. The total volume of <br />irrigated acres will be reduced as compared to the baseline projections. <br />4. Recreation Impacts - Impacts to recreation move in both directions. Some water <br />projects which include reservoir-based recreation will be forgone. This foregone <br />"See Miller and Blair (1985) (pp. 325-327) for a discussion of such modeling methods. <br /> <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.