9387 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1 1 1 IF_ L?' 1 1 1 1 1 t 7 scenario include the non-livestock agricultural sectors, construction, recreation, and the electric power sector (contained in the Transportation, Communications, and Utilities sector).' Table 3-A-1 Industrial Sectors Renre.eented in the I_0 Mndel Sector Percent of Total Employment Percent of Total Output Direct Impact Livestock 1.88 1.55 no Grains and Livestock Feeds 0.21 0.16 yes Other Crops 0.13 0.14 yes Other Agriculture 1.79 1.29 no Non-Petroleum Mining 0.31 1.40 no Petroleum and Gas 2.63 10.93 no New Construction and Repairs 8.33 10.88 yes Combined Manufacturing 0.26 1.01 no Food Products 3.07 7.06 no Wood Products 1.74 2.75 no Transport, Comm. & Utilities (TCU) 5.14 17.02 yes Recreational Services 15.40 7.45 yes Wholesale/ Retail Trade 12.48 5.46 no F. I. R. E. 4.72 10.06 no Household and Business Services 11.59 7.79 no Health, Educ., Soc., and Gov't. Svcs 30.32 15.06 no i ne percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding. The I-O model methodology of the original study of the critical habitat designation of the four Colorado River fishes (see Brookshire et. al., 1993, 1994) is used to project the economy as it would develop absent the critical habitat designation (WOFBA scenario) and as it would develop with the critical habitat designation (WF scenario), as well as the economic adjustments that this would entail. The differences in economic activity between these two scenarios represent the impacts associated with actions taken to preserve and recover the endangered fishes. B. Construction of the Baseline Projection ' The Jicarilla Apache water leases are treated as an injection of cash into the economy in each year. This is reflected in changes in consumption patterns. 19 1