My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9387
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9387
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:37:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9387
Author
Brookshire, D. S., M. McKee and S. Stewart.
Title
A Four Corners Regional Focus on the Economic Impact of Critical Habitat Designation for teh Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squawfish, and Bonytail.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
Albuquerque.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1 <br /> <br />frame of 1995-2040 should capture all of the impacts of the fishes' recovery. At different points <br />in time, various impacts will be associated with the fishes' recovery. To compare the WOFBA <br />with the WF projections requires that all future values be discounted to yield present-value <br />1 estimates. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />H <br />1 <br />D. Data Sources <br />1. Baseline Model Data <br />The data used to construct the baseline model for 1990 were derived from the U.S. Department <br />of Agriculture IMPLAN data sets for Arizona, Colorado, Utah, and New Mexico. These data <br />sets provide consistent county-level data from which to construct a set of 1-0 accounts for the <br />region. Because the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) <br />national projections of economic activity do not capture localized projects. the baseline was <br />adjusted to include planned local water development projects. This additional development of <br />water supplies leads to increased economic activity in the region due to increases in agriculture, <br />municipal, industrial, and water sales/leasing. Existing cropping patterns were used to project <br />increases in economic activity due to the potential increases in irrigable acreage that new water <br />development projects would bring. Individual tribal projections for future cropping patterns, <br />water leasing, etc. were used where available. <br />1 2. Survey <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />A survey was sent to the four tribes for whom the study was conducted in May of 1995. The <br />survey is included in Appendix A. Information about on- and off-reservation employment, <br />incomes, and planned development projects was requested. Only a few pieces of requested <br />information were available from the tribes. Of the information provided, the following was used: <br />Jicarilla Apache: Water development plans; Navajo Nation: Water development plans, on- <br />reservation employment. Southern Ute and Ute Mountain Ute: Bookman-Edmonston report <br />titled "Animas-La Plata and Colorado Ute Water Rights Settlement Act." <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.