9392 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Table 4-A-1 Inc luded Local Water Pro'ects Additions to baseline Com onent of Pro'ect De letion acre-feet/ r Starts Ih'nish NIIP 8 31,866 1996 1998 9 28,775 1996 2000 10 31,797 1999 2001 11 21,630 2000 2002 ALP Phase I Stage A (all M&n 57,100 1996 2003 Stage B (Irrigation) 54,485 1998 2005 Phase II Stage C (Irrigation) 42,988 2005 2010 San Juan Water Leasing I 5,354 2000 NA Chama Water Leasing II 26,646 2010 NA San Juan Water Delivery 31,000 2000 2002 Gallop 1. Start and finish dates are necessary to determine when impacts occur in the two scenarios. The "Start" date is the date of commencement of construction on the project; at that time additional economic activity occurs in the construction sector. The "Finish" date is when water deliveries actually begin; this would represent additional activity in the agriculture, power, and M&I sectors. The dates for ALP, NIIP, and San Juan Gallup are probably optimistic. This will have the effect of overstating the impacts offish protection measures. San Juan-Chama The Jicarilla Apache Water Rights Settlement Act (106 Stat 2237) gives the tribe 25,500 AF1yr consumptive use from the Navajo River and 6,500 AF/yr consumptive use of the San Juan- Chama Project water, which it intends to lease to users outside of the study area. Although the tribe has no intention of applying this water to agricultural or M&I uses within the study area, revenues from leasing create additional activity in the study area in the form of increased consumption expenditures. Using projections provided by the tribe (see Aberly, 1995), 5,354 AF/yr was assumed to be leased to cities outside the study area (Albuquerque and Santa Fe) for the years 2000-2009. At an assumed 19951ease rate of $132/AF/yr, this represents an annual injection of $706,728/yr into the tribal economy. For the years 2010-2040 it was assumed that 27